cellio: (kitties)
Monica ([personal profile] cellio) wrote2002-07-19 12:46 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Someone is, apparently in all seriousness, developing a TV show for cats -- not cat lovers, but cats. I think they have missed a critical point about their revenue stream; most cats don't have access to the phone and charge cards, or the car to go to the store. :-)

[identity profile] tangerinpenguin.livejournal.com 2002-07-19 10:09 am (UTC)(link)
Besides, it's not clear that cats react to the same things on TV that they do in the real, three-dimensional world: Chimneysweep, for example, has never reacted to animals on TV anything like he does to other animals in the real world. On the other hand, he actually seemed to enjoy Voyager.

No, I don't let him have the remote often anymore :-)

[identity profile] amergina.livejournal.com 2002-07-19 10:45 am (UTC)(link)
I think they have missed a critical point about their revenue stream; most cats don't have access to the phone and charge cards, or the car to go to the store.

Actually, it's the insane cat-owner-who-thinks-that-his/her-cat-is-human that they're going after. ;)

[identity profile] autographedcat.livejournal.com 2002-07-19 11:11 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, you never know.

A cable comapny in South Carolina had one of those computer-tv-schedule channels. When the computer broke, rather than have that channel be off-the-air, they pointed a video camera at the aquarium in the office, and broadcast that singal live in its place. (I think they patched in audio from the local NPR station). Two weeks later, the computer was fixed and they put the schedule back on the air.

They were literally deluged with phone calls from people upset that the Aquarium channel was no longer available, and did they have plans to bring it back? Eventually, they relented and put the Aquarium feed on permenantly on an unused channel.

H.L. Menken said one would never go broke underestimating the American people. I think he may have been right.

-R