another movie night
Dec. 26th, 2002 10:50 pmLast night Gail, her parents, and Dani and I went
to see Star Trek: Nemesis. It was a fun
movie. It had liberal doses of plot issues and
bad science, but you know to expect that. They
still managed to tell an interesting story, if
you just suspend disbelief. Short takes (and I'm
mostly going to ignore the aforementioned plot
issues and bad science):
- There were some fun bits in the first wedding. Thank you for sparing us the second one on-screen. I wasn't ready for a naked Ryker -- or Picard, for that matter.
- That looks like a very effective weapon, if you can distract people during the 7-minute power-up sequence. (I think the smaller instance we saw was not nearly that long, though. The best uses of this weapon are not in planet-killing but rather in government chambers and the like.)
- "Nature versus nurture" is so 20th-century...
- How the heck is Janeway an admiral while Picard is not?!
- I am very happy with the fact that we did not get a huge honking reset button with Data's name on it. For once, actual change. Yes, of course they could put things back the way they were with suitable applications of technobabble, but I hope they won't.
The big winner, though, is The Core. I am looking forward to seeing this. I'm sure the science will be, um, "novel", but it looks like they're doing a good-enough job with the story that I don't care. A US weapons program goes wrong; the end of the world is imminent. But wait; we just might be able to stop it, if we just drill into the center of the earth and... do something. I loved some of the humorous bits that showed up in the trailer, and it appears that there will be copious explosions and the like, so the movie will probably appeal to a broad audience.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-12-27 11:32 am (UTC)This is a good point. And I do like the fact that we did see change without resets. I did enjoy the movie.
It looks like a typical Jim Carrey movie
Ah -- I was supposed to recognize the name, then. Oops. :-) What are some of his others?
The Core: You could be right, of course; won't know until I see it. (I didn't see Armageddon.) It looks like they are bringing humor to it and some amount of introspection (the "we caused this" angle), which puts it ahead of many just-plain-action-and-explosions movies. It's possible to do that well or badly, of course; I liked the bits they showed in the trailer, though of course trailers are designed that way.
Terminator 3 is finally happening? Thanks; I hadn't heard. It's been a long time...
(no subject)
Date: 2002-12-27 01:41 pm (UTC)Ah -- I was supposed to recognize the name, then. Oops. :-) What are some of his others?
The Mask, The Grinch Who Stole Christmas, Dumb and Dumber, The Cable Guy, Ace Ventura Pet Detective, The Truman Show, The Majestic... He has quite a list. Some are good, some suck rocks. No one chews the scenery like Jim Carrey does.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-12-27 03:37 pm (UTC)Ah -- I was supposed to recognize the name, then. Oops. :-) What are some of his others?
Well, most of the over-the-top comedies of the past ten years. Off the top of my head: Ace Ventura, Pet Detective I & II; How the Grinch Stole Christmas; Liar, Liar; Me, Myself & Irene; The Mask; The Truman Show; Dumb and Dumber; and Batman Forever. (And a lot of others that I'm not thinking of offhand.) Some very good movies, some very bad ones, but all of them big hits.
Carrey is very odd, and his comic style isn't to all tastes. IMO, he's done enough good stuff to demonstrate that he has talent, and enough bad stuff to demonstrate that he doesn't always have taste