short takes
Second time... during the shoot. Ouch.
D&D on Wednesday was fun. We were fighting a party that we were trying not to kill (friendly folks under mind-control magic), which made it challenging. My sorceror did not throw even a single fireball. :-) I think my character's paladinhood-enhanced saving throws took Ralph by surprise, though, even though we had discussed it in the abstract. (Yes, there is a natural synergy in D&D 3.0 between sorcerors and paladins. Odd but true. And our ultra-benevolent GM is letting me do it. Mind, part of what he gets out of this is a significant plot hook when he needs it, because of the way he implemented it, but I figure it'll be a good story so that works for me.)
This week's West Wing gave me hope: a good, well-executed episode in the post-Sorkin world. I hope it's indicative of what's to come. (I just about fell out of my chair laughing during the speech-writing scene, because I knew what had to be coming.)
At last night's board meeting, the rabbi urged us all to make short appointments for individual chats. Last time he made that offer the result for me was regular one-on-one study with him. I wonder what'll happen this time. :-)
Trick-or-treating hours in my neighborhood are generally pretty early (5-7ish), so we're usually not even home from work. This year Halloween is on Shabbat, though, and post-DST-change, which means I'll certainly be home. Not excited about dealing with it, but home nonetheless. I guess I should pick up some candy. :-) (I don't mind the little kids at all; while I don't get into the whole "oh isn't that CUTE!" and/or "oh I'm so SCARED!" thing, I'm willing to play along on the candy ritual. It's the teenagers who don't even put on costumes but just show up on your doorstep holding out sacks that bug me. If you want to play, you should at least try.)
We're attending a bar mitzvah (and luncheon) tomorrow. I am unclear on the gift protocol. We haven't been invited to a gathering that isn't on Shabbat, so the choices appear to be: take the gift to the synagogue or take it to their house sometime later. I'll probably tell Dani to put it in the car (I'm walking for the earlier service; he'll meet me for the late service) but leave it in the car until we see what other people are doing. Just goes to show that there are some things you don't learn in classes. :-)
I have a gazillion LJ codes; if anyone reading this needs one, just say so.
re: Mel's movie
Re: Mel's movie
Re: Mel's movie
no subject
Shabbat Bar Mitzvah Gifts
Jonathan found that getting gifts on his Shabbat-only bar mitzvah from less observant relatives to be very uncomfortable.
Re: Shabbat Bar Mitzvah Gifts
Re: Shabbat Bar Mitzvah Gifts
no subject
no subject
The only purpose of the game is mutual enjoyment, so the only reason to deny a request (particularly one that's within the rules) is if there's a real argument that denying the request adds to mutual enjoyment overall.
In this case, even if the original motivation was for munchkin purposes, we found a good story for it, and her story as a paladin who doesn't know the paladin's code is an interesting story.
no subject
Yes, there's at least some hope... but do you ever come out of an episode with a strange desire to mail a crate of high-wattage lightbulbs to the White House?
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I hate to be snarky and cynical, but has this been validated in any useful way? I couldn't find it on Snopes, but it still screams "urban legend," especially given the lighting rod (if you'll pardon the choice of metaphor) that the The Passion has been for speculative criticism.
Well. Hey.
Re: Well. Hey.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)