short takes
Giant Microbes
-- plushie toys for your favorite maladies, from the
common cold to Ebola. Perfect for your Valentine's Day needs;
surely this beats
adopted
cockroaches. Plushie link courtesy of
browngirl.
Ur-ine Control,
a urinal turned videogame controller, from those wackos at MIT
(I say that with the utmost respect, of course). Link courtesy
of
the_never.
A good
analysis of the current economic doings in Pittsburgh by
tangerinpenguin. My favorite part:
"[The mayor's] track record for recognizing when he's a part
of Playa Politics only in the same sense that Frosted Choco-Bombs
are part of this complete breakfast, unfortunately, bodes poorly."
I didn't watch the superbowl (not even the commercials),
but apparently one of the anti-smoking ads has a real
web site: Shards O
Glass Freeze-Pops. As
jducoeur said,
this shows dedication to a nasty satire. (The ad is there,
too, for those who missed it like I did.)
Today in talmud study: some not-very-satisfying, but interesting, attempts at the age-old question of why bad things happen to good people and vice-versa. I'll write it up later. (This is a reminder to myself. And I know I also owe an interview and a set of questions.)
In the last several days the amount of spam I receive seems to have decreased, from about 100 messages a day to about 50-60. I wonder who I should thank. Or is it just seasonal, with the end of the month being more popular than the beginning of the month?
no subject
no subject
no subject
Re:
Friends of mine have a tradition of an election-night party, potluck -- "bring poltiical food". I wonder if anyone will still remember this come November. :-)
no subject
I was highly amused.
Re:
no subject
Paranoia has its uses. There was a recent story about a video game that has a shoot-out in the subway system. Along the wall of the virtual subway was an advertisement complete with a website. The game designer didn't register the website, so pornographers did!
no subject
The ruling was issued by the request of the legislature, which is drafting a state constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. The process will take three years, and requires a referendum at the end. MA is pretty much the worst state in which to try such a referendum, since we have the highest per capita of gay households in the country.
In the meantime, the state will be forced to issue marriage licenses to gay couples. It'll be interesting to see what this does to reciprocity agreements with other states.
Pretty much the only thing that will stop this now is an amendment to the US Constitution, which Bush has pledged to push through Congress. Realistically, that that would require ratification by 2/3rds of Congress and 3/4ths of State Legislatures, a winnable battle on the part of gay rights activists. Bush is just banging his drum to shore up his conservative base.
Re:
That, and what will happen to all of those legal marriages if they do manage to force through a (state) constitutional amendment in a few years. Even if Bush were to force through an amendment to the US constitution, which I agree would be a real challenge, it would take years -- so again, you have the problem of all those marriages that were legal, and are they really going to be able to nullify them after the fact?