research methodologies
Feb. 14th, 2004 07:06 pmThis afternoon someone mentioned the "fact" that after either the battle of Crecy or the battle of Agincourt (he couldn't remember which), the heralds from the two sides got together to decide what to officially name the battle. (I've heard such assertions in the SCA before.) Now I don't actually know, because neither heraldry nor the history of these particular battles is well-represented in my store of semi-catalogued possibly-useful knowledge, but... this just seems unlikely. It strikes me as a modern back-fill.
Why? Because I have this gut feeling that the notion of a battle (or war) having a single, "official" name used by both sides is a modern construct. My instinct says that it just didn't matter until people started writing textbooks and stuff. (I mean, look, we can't even all agree on the name for a certain mid-19th-century North-American war, and that's recent.)
I'm mildly curious about the answer, but I'm much more curious about the methods one might use to research a question like this. The broader question, I mean -- not whether the sides at Agincourt agreed on a name, but when the idea of names of this sort became important. I generally think of myself as having decent research clues, but if I were in a library trying to puzzle this one out I'm not sure what I would do other than asking the reference librarian. :-) (Which is a fine answer; that's what they're there for. But if I wanted to be self-sufficient...?)
Why? Because I have this gut feeling that the notion of a battle (or war) having a single, "official" name used by both sides is a modern construct. My instinct says that it just didn't matter until people started writing textbooks and stuff. (I mean, look, we can't even all agree on the name for a certain mid-19th-century North-American war, and that's recent.)
I'm mildly curious about the answer, but I'm much more curious about the methods one might use to research a question like this. The broader question, I mean -- not whether the sides at Agincourt agreed on a name, but when the idea of names of this sort became important. I generally think of myself as having decent research clues, but if I were in a library trying to puzzle this one out I'm not sure what I would do other than asking the reference librarian. :-) (Which is a fine answer; that's what they're there for. But if I wanted to be self-sufficient...?)
Re:
Date: 2004-02-14 07:17 pm (UTC)(I wonder if
Re:
Date: 2004-02-15 03:40 pm (UTC)That's a really interesting question. Since I'm taking a reference class this semester, I should be able to figure it out. :-) I'll think about it some and maybe ask on the class list if I get stuck. I have a paper due tonight, so it will probably be tomorrow before I get to it.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-15 05:43 pm (UTC)