car shopping
Feb. 17th, 2004 02:33 pmWord from the highly-competent mechanic who does all my car work (and, most immediately relevant, inspections) is that I will be buying a new car this year. Not surprising, but it's a pity. I had been hoping to hold onto the current car for a couple more years while waiting for field of hybrid offerings to get larger.
I've been paying attention to the car write-ups in Consumer Reports; alas, I think I will need to make a decision before the big 2004 buying guide comes out. That's unfortunate but not catastrophic. I mean, that's what the interim articles and the Internet are for. :-)
Because all knowledge is contained on LJ ( :-) ), I'll go ahead and list my requirements in case any of y'all have suggestions. My current "investigate these" list is: Mazda (what I have now), Toyota Prius, the new Honda hybrid, and I'd kind of like to find a US-made option too. I don't think there's anything that anyone could say to get me to look at a Saturn; my husband has had too many problems with his, and it's also uncomfortable.
The car will be mainly a commuter car, but a couple times a year I need to be able to stuff lots of crap into it and go on vacation, so it can't suck in terms of cargo capacity. Hatchbacks are good. I was going to say it has to be a hatchback, but maybe there's something else out there that meets all my needs, so I'll just leave it at a strong, strong preference for hatchbacks.
Visibility must be excellent. (This is the other area where my current hatchback totally rocks.) I want to look in the rear-view mirror and see the rear view, not car parts. I want to glance over my shoulder and see what's coming up in the adjacent lane, trivially. That sort of thing. Most sedans and all station wagons that I have driven (albeit not a large sample size) have been inadequate in this area.
I prefer smaller cars, within the parameters given above. They're more maneuverable (city parking, yay), and they tend to be more fuel-efficient.
It should handle snow and ice reasonably, because this is Pittsburgh.
I would, naturally, like it to not suck when it comes to comfort, fuel economy, safety, maintenance, and all the usual small stuff. But I think most of what I'd be considering will be ok for most of this.
What other cars should I be looking at?
I've been paying attention to the car write-ups in Consumer Reports; alas, I think I will need to make a decision before the big 2004 buying guide comes out. That's unfortunate but not catastrophic. I mean, that's what the interim articles and the Internet are for. :-)
Because all knowledge is contained on LJ ( :-) ), I'll go ahead and list my requirements in case any of y'all have suggestions. My current "investigate these" list is: Mazda (what I have now), Toyota Prius, the new Honda hybrid, and I'd kind of like to find a US-made option too. I don't think there's anything that anyone could say to get me to look at a Saturn; my husband has had too many problems with his, and it's also uncomfortable.
The car will be mainly a commuter car, but a couple times a year I need to be able to stuff lots of crap into it and go on vacation, so it can't suck in terms of cargo capacity. Hatchbacks are good. I was going to say it has to be a hatchback, but maybe there's something else out there that meets all my needs, so I'll just leave it at a strong, strong preference for hatchbacks.
Visibility must be excellent. (This is the other area where my current hatchback totally rocks.) I want to look in the rear-view mirror and see the rear view, not car parts. I want to glance over my shoulder and see what's coming up in the adjacent lane, trivially. That sort of thing. Most sedans and all station wagons that I have driven (albeit not a large sample size) have been inadequate in this area.
I prefer smaller cars, within the parameters given above. They're more maneuverable (city parking, yay), and they tend to be more fuel-efficient.
It should handle snow and ice reasonably, because this is Pittsburgh.
I would, naturally, like it to not suck when it comes to comfort, fuel economy, safety, maintenance, and all the usual small stuff. But I think most of what I'd be considering will be ok for most of this.
What other cars should I be looking at?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-17 12:05 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-18 10:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-17 12:09 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-17 07:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-17 09:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-17 12:13 pm (UTC)However, it's reasonably fuel efficient (though if you go for AWD as I did that'll eat into your mileage a little), it's a hatchback or mini station wagon depending on your point of view, it has lovely headroom, and it does have a nice big cargo area, especially when the seats are folded.
I considered a hybrid, but could not get a Prius to test-drive, and have a strong preference for Toyotas.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-17 07:45 pm (UTC)Did you know that those headrests pop out? I complained about that and the guy reached in and solved the problem. :-) (I figure if I actually *have* rear passengers we can put 'em back in, but I almost never do.)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-17 12:26 pm (UTC)I love Toyota myself (being an owner of a 9 year old Tercel) - the Matrix is very interesting but I have not test driven it. We are looking at changing in the Tercel soon as it won't be a really good mountain car and looking at mostly the same parameters as you - although we'd prefer that it wasn't US made (I think I'm going to get in political hot water over that one)
Re:
Date: 2004-02-17 12:30 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-17 07:48 pm (UTC)I think I'm going to get in political hot water over that one
Not from me -- different strokes for different folks and all that.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-17 12:31 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-18 05:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-17 12:31 pm (UTC)I've been very happy with my Jetta, and since you prefer the hatchback body style maybe a Golf would be worth looking at?
Re:
Date: 2004-02-17 07:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-17 12:38 pm (UTC)Tofi has a honda hybrid, I believe.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-17 07:59 pm (UTC)for kicks...
Date: 2004-02-17 01:40 pm (UTC)dano and I are going this weekend, mostly cause I suspect it will be my one and only chance to see a 2004 aniversary edition Mustang coupe up close and personal ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-17 03:46 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-17 08:01 pm (UTC)Re: for kicks...
Date: 2004-02-17 08:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-17 03:45 pm (UTC)You might take a look at the Car Talk Test Drive (http://www.cartalk.com/content/testdrives/) archive. The reviews there hit a lot of useful points like visibility, usability, and how easy it is to let a dog in and out of the test vehicles. :-)
Re:
Date: 2004-02-17 08:03 pm (UTC)Input from an acquaintance of mine
Date: 2004-02-17 07:42 pm (UTC)I asked for his thoughts and he replied
I hope that might be of some help
Re: Input from an acquaintance of mine
Date: 2004-02-17 08:10 pm (UTC)Wjat
Date: 2004-02-17 09:37 pm (UTC)Besides, there are lots of cars that are rebranded by more than one automaker, so you might have a Mazda model and a Chevy model that are exactly the same except for slightly different trim. (The 323 was a prime example, but I forget which American car was the same one with a different name)
Re: Wjat
Date: 2004-02-17 09:38 pm (UTC)Re: Wjat
Date: 2004-02-18 06:42 am (UTC)Yes, the Geo Prizm (later Chevy Prizm) that I had until last month was a rebrand of the Toyota Corolla. It got great mileage and needed very little work, until the end days. In November, my Chevy dealership said "you are now in the market for a new car." (118K miles - when I'd been hoping to get to at least 150K)
And the Pontiac Vibe appears to be the same as the current Toyota Matrix.
Re: Wjat
Date: 2004-02-18 10:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-17 11:49 pm (UTC)- I got automatic windows so that I could defog the passenger side window while driving. The gasket isn't quite tight enough to do that effectively. However, rolling down a foggy window still works.
- The slide on the heat/A/C control has a few catch spots while adjusting it, it feels like a cheap 59-cent part that will one day break off and leave me with an expensive repair bill.
- The cupholders... well, it was a nice thought, but they don't work very well.
- My first car, a hatchback, had a rear washer/wiper, a luxury that I miss (though coupes don't need them as much as hatchbacks.)
- A number of folks who've borrowed the car have commented on how uncomfortable the seats are.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-18 10:17 am (UTC)Heh. Good point. Maybe brand isn't an indicator of anything after all. :-) (How do you find out?)
Thanks for the comments on the Civic!