was she trying for irony?
Apr. 20th, 2004 08:40 amEats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation sounds like a great book for grammar nerds, but I am put off somewhat by the 1.5 punctuation errors in the title. (One is debatable and might be excused by context (it refers to a joke containing the phrase); the other is clearly wrong.)
Re: ampersand?
Date: 2004-04-20 02:43 pm (UTC)Me too. It's just part of the idea that you don't (or really shouldn't expect to) control rendering; your HTML source is a hint to the browser, but if you're trying to do fine-grained control, you're probably approaching it wrong. HTML (and even moreso XML) is about separating content from rendering; it should work on a high-res display or on a 15" monitor at low setting, and (ideally) on a PDA as well. Web designers who try to craft magazine-style web sites are doing a disservice overall. Unfortunately, a lot of stuff crept into HTML early on that makes it easy to do that kind of web site, and Microsoft Word isn't helping matters. But anyway, my source always has the two spaces, and if the browser wants to change that, well, it's allowed.
Re: ampersand?
Date: 2004-04-20 11:05 pm (UTC)Re: ampersand?
Date: 2004-04-21 06:47 am (UTC)I'm not aware of any. I think the only way to give the browser stronger hints about the spaces you want is to use the special characters, which is a royal pain in the tush (and makes your source border on unreadable, though I suppose you could write a transformation script if you cared that much).
Re: ampersand?
Date: 2004-04-22 09:50 pm (UTC)Re: ampersand?
Date: 2004-04-23 06:23 am (UTC)