cellio: (demons-of-stupidity)
[personal profile] cellio
Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation sounds like a great book for grammar nerds, but I am put off somewhat by the 1.5 punctuation errors in the title. (One is debatable and might be excused by context (it refers to a joke containing the phrase); the other is clearly wrong.)
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 05:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnomi.livejournal.com
She's British, so for her it may not be an error.

Actually, one of the complaints I read about the American printing of the book was that there was no introduction added to explain the differences between American and British English grammar.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 06:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rani23.livejournal.com
Another thing to consider is that the author doesn't usually have control over what the front of the book looks like -- that's often up to the publisher.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 06:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] murmur311.livejournal.com
The missing comma isn't necessarily a British thing, either. The editors here (at my magazine) are very adamant about not having that last comma- something I discovered when I began doing the calendar listings.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 06:21 am (UTC)
ironangel: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ironangel
I know that the missing comma is controversial

Both formats are now equally acceptable. We went several rounds on this on in my technical writing class. No clue on the hypen, though. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 06:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steven.livejournal.com
I'm not a fan of the serial comma, but I'd hyphenate "zero tolerance."

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 06:42 am (UTC)
ext_4917: (Default)
From: [identity profile] hobbitblue.livejournal.com
Um, I see no grammar mistakes - what comma, where? (bear in mind I'm a Brit)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 06:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sui66iy.livejournal.com
Interestingly, if you type "zero tolerance" into Amazon's search box, only one of the top ten titles presented contains a hyphen. (Adding the hyphen to the search expression does not change this.)

This is consistent with the Wikipedia's claim (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyphen) that most advertising and labeling eschews use of the hyphen in favor of visual cleanliness.

(The comma thing was obviously intentional. The whole point is to attract the attention of grammar sticklers such as yourself.)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 06:55 am (UTC)
ext_4917: (backpacker - guitarist)
From: [identity profile] hobbitblue.livejournal.com
Ah, right, the latter is correct in the UK, the extra comma would be marked as incorrect. And besides, its the fact that the first comma is mistakenly put into a sentence which requires neither that is the pun of the title (and a book I really must read some time).

Both forms of the adjective thing are valid, as far as I know.

Thanks for explaining!

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 07:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amergina.livejournal.com
If I remember correctly from talking to Karen, The Associated Press uses the X, Y & Z form of commas. All the papers she ever worked at followed the AP guidelines. I prefer the X, Y, & Z form and use it in my documentation. As long as the usage is consistent, it's fine. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 07:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkerdave.livejournal.com
FWIW, I was taught that the second is proper usage and that the first was wrong.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 07:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ichur72.livejournal.com
The lack of hyphenation in zero-tolerance seems to be controversial, but ... When I learned copy editing at my university paper (we used the AP stylebook), I seem to remember that the rule was to hyphenate if the words in question were being used as an adjective (as they are here) and not to hyphenate if the words in question were being used as a noun. To wit:

"I have zero tolerance for this approach."

vs.

"The principal's zero-tolerance policy won enthusiastic support from parents."

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 07:16 am (UTC)
ext_4917: (Default)
From: [identity profile] hobbitblue.livejournal.com
Um, not sure. I know that items in a list must be separated by a comma unless there's an and, but your example is properly two separate things so I think it could go either way.

Having said that, despite having picked up a very keen sense of grammar over the years I didn't get much formal tuition in it, so the finer points sometimes elude me, time to reach for Fowler's English Grammar and Usage for a definitive version!

ampersand?

Date: 2004-04-20 07:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] caryabend.livejournal.com
I used to place a comma between the last two items in a list, even when using the word "and." This changed for me within the last several years when I found that it violated some revised grammar rules. (Similar to the "one space after the period between sentences" rule.)

What I don't know is if substituting the ampersand symbol changes the rule for placing a comma. I suspect it may, but I don't have a trustworthy non-web reference handy.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 07:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkerdave.livejournal.com
The commas. Here's how I was taught:

A, B and Z <- correct
A, B, and Z <- wrong

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-20 08:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ralphmelton.livejournal.com
My favorite serial-comma argument is "I'd like to thank my parents, Ayn Rand and God."

(That was the example that convinced Steve Jackson Games to change its house style to use the serial comma.)
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags