the cold equations
Jun. 25th, 2004 12:11 amI had previously been under the impression that one of the pivotal characters was a child (of perhaps nine or ten), not an eighteen-year-old. I found that this affected my enjoyment of the story; the character makes a mistake with consequences (not following directions, in a really big way), and when I thought those mistakes were being made by a child I had more sympathy. As it is, it's hard for me to really appreciate this character's angst. The story is also somewhat a product of its time (the 50s); the other main character makes a point of saying he would have handled things differently if it had been a "man". (Aside: she's a "girl".) It's still a good story, but I liked it better with my mistaken impressions. :-)
There was a Twilight Zone episode based on the story (the series from about a decade ago, which I mostly missed due to not having the right cable channels available). I'd kind of like to see that.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-25 08:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-25 01:36 pm (UTC)Ok, stories about jetisoning all possible equipment (down to the clothing) and succeeding aren't very interesting, so I guess you have to end up with either the original answer or the pilot sacrifice you describe. (Or a crash, but let's assume that's not acceptable.) But that does not make for a story that satisfies me, perhaps because the passenger is insufficiently sympathetic for me. Maybe I'm too cold-hearted or something, but I would have more sympathy for a toddler or dog that wandered on by accident than I would for someone who walked past the "no trespassing" signs and stowed away. I mean yeah, it's sad -- that's the point -- but it was avoidable.