the ambiguities of modern air travel

[cellio]

I'll be flying to a conference in a week and a half. I haven't flown in a while (though I did fly once not long after 9/11/01) and the rules probably aren't stable, so among things, I checked the airline's web site for the current baggage restrictions.

I guess it's nice that they've listed the items obviously banned in carryon baggage, like firearms and infectious materials, but where do I go to find out if nail clippers and the like are still banned? (That's just an example.) I'm hoping to avoid being slowed down by checked bags.

They have a section on "special baggage". I expected it to contain items like child car seats, which it does. I was kind of surprised by entries for antlers, christmas trees, and personal floatation devices. (I also see nothing about pets, which I suspect is a more common case than antlers.) But next time I want to fly with a christmas tree, I'll know where to look.

Trivia of the day: a musical instrument for which you buy a (full-fare!) seat must not exceed 165 pounds. Many passengers exceed 165 pounds; why is a musical instrument held to a different standard? Mind, I'm having trouble thinking of an instrument that weighs more than 165 pounds but (1) would fit in those little seats and (2) could be carried on in the first place, but that's not the point. (It appears that flights no longer come with meals, so the question of whether my hypothetical string bass is entitled to its own sandwich and Diet Coke is moot. Demanding its own bag of peanuts just doesn't have the same effect.)

Comments

[cellio]

Thanks for the pointer!

Eeek. The part about being criminally liable for bringing forbidden items, in combination with the waiver that the inspectors can make judgements on the fly, is scary!

[dr-zrfq.livejournal.com]

This is why I am *NOT* flying to Denver for KWHS next year (I'll either be taking the train or riding with someone). It's not that I hate airplanes: it's that I hate airPORTs.