odds and ends

[cellio]

I'm registered and I'm voting. Six degrees of voting seems to be an effort to track this. (It shows who's connected to whom and how each person plans to vote, so I suppose if there were a lot more data some sociologist could study clustering or something. If you follow the link, you'll show up as being connected to me.)

The producers of West Wing are talking about the next administration. I had always assumed that the series would end when Bartlet's presidency ends; apparently that's not the case.

I think continuing on, following the next administration, would be a mistake. The draw of the show is the characters, and if you're going to even pretend to be realistic, most of them are going to swap out with a change in president. Even if the next president is from the same party, he'll have his own staff (mostly) and the current folks will have been in high-stress jobs for eight years.

So they can do another white-house-centered show, and even call it "West Wing", but without Bartlet, Leo, CJ, Josh, Toby, and the others, it won't be West Wing.

Thanks to rectangularcat for the tape of the season finale for 24! (Your card made me laugh.)

I owe a couple of interviews and some icons. I'm working on them.

Comments

[cellio]

Feh. Without Sorkin, it's not West Wing, she said bitterly.

Well, yeah. The writing is just not up to the old level.

But it's really not West Wing if all the old characters go away. As you pointed out, it's an ensemble show. If I was going to pick any member of that ensemble to be the "seed" for a new ensemble sequel, it would not be Sam.

Tell me more about Desperate Housewives? (I think I remember you mentioning it a few weeks ago, but I don't recall any details, like genre or premise.)