short takes
Oct. 28th, 2004 02:06 pm
There are only two classes at the upcoming Academy (SCA
event) that specifically interest me. (Thanks,
dagonell, for the list.) Naturally, they
are scheduled against each other. Sigh. (They weren't
on the previous draft.) There are some classes that
I wouldn't mind taking so it's probably worth
going, mind; I'm just a little frustrated. (The advance
information doesn't include names of teachers [update: just
added, yay], which could
make a difference for classes I wouldn't attend just based
on title. A good teacher can make all the difference, and
we have some of those in this kingdom.) Still, it looks
like a weaker slate than I'm used to.
A news story reported that someone was convicted of "attempted first-degree intentional homicide". I thought the difference between homicide and manslaughter was intent, meaning there's no such thing as unintentional homicide. So I'm assuming sloppy writing here, though I'll admit to being a little confused at times about the degree thing, which might be relevant. My impression is that "first degree homicide" means "I specifically meant to kill you, in cold blood if necessary, you scum", that "third degree manslaughter" means "I was doing something I should have known could kill someone, but I sure didn't mean to kill or hurt anyone, let alone you specifically", and that everything else falls in between.
To the writers on West Wing: we want our characters back; could you repeat the ransom demand?
The relevant network [1] moved Jack and Bobby into the same time slot as West Wing. That's a smart move, as the show seems to be aimed at the same viewers (though the shows are very different) and WW is floundering. But I also wonder how much scheduling actually matters these days; doesn't just about every TV-viewing household have at least one recording device? Competing shows aren't the problem they once were.
[1] Yeah, branding is real effective on me... I notice the intrusive logo on the screen but just don't retain the data, and the VCR takes care of remembering what channel it's on.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-28 06:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-28 07:01 pm (UTC)though you're correct that it is typically the difference between murder and manslaughter. Both murder and manslaughter are types of "homicide" I believe.
More accurately, though, if there is a reasonable expectation that one's illegal behaviour could lead to someone's death (e.g. robbing a bank), that can result in a homicide chage, even if you never intended to kill anyone. There's a felony murder rule in most states that says that if a death occurs during the commission of certain innumerated felonies, the person can be charged with murder. So if Frick and Frack rob a bank and a police officer shoots Frack and he dies... Frick (Frack's accomplice) can be charged with the murder of Frack. This certainly isn't "intentional"... but it's still murder.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-28 07:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-28 07:39 pm (UTC)First degree murder
Second degree murder
Third degree murder? (Unsure this exists)
Manslaughter
By default the difference first and second degree is the planning. However, note that many places (or maybe this is Fed?) have statutory first degree murder, which says that any death caused in the commission of a felony crime is a statutory first degree murder.
The two standard examples of that are if someone torches a building (arson) and a person is killed in the fire, and someone DUI who runs into someone and kills them. In both case, the felon may be tried for first degree murder, instead of manslaughter.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: