TV bits

[cellio]

Someone is getting a new trial in a murder case because of false testimony: "An expert witness for the state testified that Yates may have been influenced by an episode of the TV show "Law & Order" in which [...]. No such show ever aired. Yates was convicted in 2002". It took her attorneys this long to notice that? (Ok, I assume they filed the appeal a while ago, but isn't this sort of thing the reason that the sides are required to share their evidence with each other in advance? Shouldn't this have been caught before the trial ended?)

Last night I got a call from a TV-market-research outfit. First they asked how many nights anyone in the house watches anything that airs during prime time, and after thinking a moment I said "4". (I should have said "3"; I forgot that Jack & Bobby airs on Sunday at 6, not 8. Oops.) This exactly matches the number of shows anyone in the house watches, so they probably drew an incorrect conclusion from my answer, but I answered the question they asked.

They then asked to speak with the oldest male resident age 18-49, but he said talking to him would be pointless so they took me instead. It sounds like I get to be part of a test market for some new shows; they'll call me to ask me to watch something and, if I do, they'll call me right afterwards to get my feedback. Could be interesting, and if not there's no obligation, so I told them sure. Who knows, they might air something that's really good but risky, and maybe my feedback will count for something. We'll see. Not as good as being a Nielsen family, but we do what we can. :-)

Comments

Actually...

[tangerinpenguin.livejournal.com]

...I bet Alton Brown could make it worthwhile, even if you couldn't apply it personally.