cellio: (fist-of-death)
[personal profile] cellio
It's only the first week of January, and already we have a strong contender for most reprehensible legislation of the year. If this passes, then in the state of Virginia a woman who has a miscarriage will be required to notify government authorities within 12 hours or face a year in jail. Yes, you read that right. (Info from [livejournal.com profile] celebrin.)

I am rarely speechless, but I'm having trouble putting my outrage into words right now.

Update Sat 9:30pm: According to the person who posted the news initially, there has been some progress based on the huge outcry (thanks to [livejournal.com profile] paquerette for the update). There's still more that needs to be done, but the response from the blogosphere seems to have made a difference. Stay tuned.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-08 12:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paquerette.livejournal.com
See my above comment re: intent. Although I highly doubt that this guy is being truthful about his intent.

I do think the concept is bad. The wording of this is such that any sexually active woman with any possibility of having conceived could be breaking this law every time she menstruates. Women on hormonal birth control too, since they may have a fertilized egg, aka a "product of conception." It would be nice to have data, like you said, to show problems with water or such, but early miscarriage is so frequent, and often women don't know about it, or don't want to acknowledge that that's what happened.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-08 01:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dvarin.livejournal.com
The wording of this is such that any sexually active woman with any possibility of having conceived could be breaking this law every time she menstruates.

On the other hand, there would be no way to convict her due to a complete lack of evidence.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-08 03:12 am (UTC)
siderea: (Default)
From: [personal profile] siderea
1) It is legal grounds for any VA cop with a chip on his shoulder to arrest any woman, and force her to go through a state-mandated vaginal exam. Charming.

2) Gosh, do you think there might be some MDs in VA who would be happy to sell their services to the Commonwealth, looking at women's cervices so they can testify, "Yep, she is dialated, and she's not pregnant now, and she didn't report losing it...."?


(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-08 06:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dvarin.livejournal.com
It is legal grounds for any VA cop with a chip on his shoulder to arrest any woman, and force her to go through a state-mandated vaginal exam.

Ideally, you don't arrest someone unless you have good reason to believe that they're guilty, and you get in trouble for arresting excessively for no reason.

I realize that this doesn't happen in practice. If the bit about the summary execution of the exam after arrest is written into the law (I didn't read the law's text, just the commentary), then it's more prone to abuse than is reasonable--such things shouldn't be forced except by court order.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-08 03:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paquerette.livejournal.com
If she doesn't even know; yes, you're correct. I can't see how they'd find out. But I think that it's entirely possible that if a woman knows she's pregnant, and loses it very early, she might talk about it with close friends, she might write in her lj or blog about it, or talk to sympathetic people on message boards about miscarriage. All it would take would be one person pissed off at her to make a phone call, and there they have a confession that she had an "illegal miscarriage." Rather like VA's illustrious sodomy laws, it's the sort of thing that's wide open for selective prosecution as personal revenge.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-08 06:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dvarin.livejournal.com
Rather like VA's illustrious sodomy laws, it's the sort of thing that's wide open for selective prosecution as personal revenge.

In my previous comment, I was forgetting to account for the probable lack of virtue and sense on the part of the prosecutors and police officers. I can only blame a failure of realism--those happen to me sometimes. :)

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags