cellio: (out-of-mind)
[personal profile] cellio
While setting a videotape I caught a bit of a show I hadn't previously heard of, Eye for an Eye. Initially it looked like any other court-with-actual-people show (Judge Judy et al). The first clue that this was not the case was that the judge goes by the name "Extreme Akim". The second was his verdict in the custody dispute over a parrot: whichever litigant eats more worms in the courtroom obviously loves the bird more and so will win custody. I can't make this stuff up. (I also didn't continue watching after that, but I assume the plan was to carry out the verdict immediately.)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-03 10:09 pm (UTC)
siderea: (Default)
From: [personal profile] siderea
Google to the rescue:

National Lampoon Production “Eye For An Eye” Adds New Major Markets; San Francisco, Dallas Latest to Feel the Gavel


National Lampoon®, Inc. (OTCBB: NLPN) and Atlas Worldwide Syndications & Distributions announced today that their co-produced reality courtroom television series “Eye for an Eye,” has cleared several new major markets on the heels of a very successful showing at the National Association of Television Production Executives Conference (NATPE) in Las Vegas. “Eye for an Eye,” which stars "Extreme Akim" and Kato Kaelin and is slated to become a strip in September of 2005, cleared Dallas, St. Louis, San Francisco, San Diego, Las Vegas, Tulsa, Louisville, Albuquerque and Tucson last week. [...]

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-03 10:14 pm (UTC)
siderea: (Default)
From: [personal profile] siderea
I'll note that this in no way addresses the question "So is it a farce or not?"

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags