cellio: (tulips)
Monica ([personal profile] cellio) wrote2005-05-09 07:57 pm

short takes

It's a pity that all waivers aren't this straightforward (link from Dani). I particularly like: In other words, you guys won't sue us guys. We could drag this part out for pages, but you are racers, not namby-pamby whiners who sit up late at night watching TV commercials that have some lawyer telling you to call 1-800-SUETHEM.

[livejournal.com profile] dglenn re-posted a link to the spoons essay that attempts to explain living with chronic pain to healthy folks like me. It's a powerful anology that I've known about for a long time, but I wanted to (1) cache the link and (2) spread it.

Bruce Shneier on the new national ID card (link from [livejournal.com profile] goldsquare). Bruce has a lot of good things to say about why this is a bad idea. While I have some minor quibbles, I agree with what he's saying here.

I think I finally have my spam filters working reasonably well. (That is, as well as they can based just on SpamAssassin ratings and a few repeat offenders who warrant special treatment.) I occasionally get false positives, so I want to be able to glance through candidates, but at ~100/day that's tedious. It appears that sending messages rated 7 or higher to the bit bucket, while keeping 5-6 to inspect, will work. I've been using these settings for a week and during that time the "maybe spam" folder has only accumulated 80 messages (compared to 600 in "almost definitely spam"). Sadly, the spam that makes it to my inbox usually comes through with scores under 2, and much of my legitimate mail is that high, so I can't do much about that.

[identity profile] indigodove.livejournal.com 2005-05-10 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
Wow. I'd never read the "spoons" essay before, but it makes a lot of sense. Thanks for sharing it.