phone service
Jun. 29th, 2005 01:16 pmWe currently have a land line, from which we do most of our calling, and two cell phones with minimal usage (but enough that we want to keep them). We have, for each phone, a $20/month plan that provides 40 minutes (20 peak, 20 not). We feel we're over-paying for the land line; Verizon makes it hard to find out about the lower-end options and all the other fees you'll pay in advance, and we probably got sold a bill of goods on our current plan. We can undo that.
Most of our calls are local or regional. We rarely make long-distance calls, except to his family in Canada. Conventional long-distance plans really only mean the US, by the way. We used to sometimes use those 10-10-### plans for long distance, except that we couldn't keep track of which ones were best for which types of calls and when we lost the cheat sheet next to the phone we didn't recreate it.
I don't know how much Dani cares, but I want to use a conventional phone for most calls, particularly longer ones. Cell phones are not as comfortable to hold (and sometimes be able to hear on), and I assume VoIP constrains me to use a mic while sitting at my computer, which is sub-optimal. (We are, by the way, very satisfied with our DSL service, so we're probably not open to changing that as part of a package.)
My current thinking is that we should get a minimal local service plan for the land line and use cell phones for long-distance calls. This implies that we want cell plans that include free long distance (I gather that's common). Ideally, we'd have a two-phone single plan (shared bucket of minutes), but so far those look more expensive than two individual plans. Maybe I just don't know where to shop. Carriers don't advertise their cheaper options sometimes; we couldn't find our current plan on Sprint's web site when we last looked for it.
We currently have Sprint for the cell phones. We like the phones and the service has been fine so far. We're not averse to buying new phones if we need to change carriers. We do both require phones that fit comfortably in a pocket, which presumably means flip-phones. We basically don't care about other features. We want to keep our phone numbers.
Who and what should we be looking at? What other questions should we be asking ourselves?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-29 05:24 pm (UTC)I could pass any questions on to my brother in Texas, though, because I know he uses Vonage's VOIP service.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-29 05:46 pm (UTC)Skype (http:/www.skype.com) (which I use at work, not yet at home) and you might be able to cut the landline altogether.
Note that in a power failure, you'd have to use cell phones. Same for DSL failure.
Also note that E911 does not work as well with cell phones - but that may not be an issue.
My cell is perfectly comfortable to use - when I use the headset.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-29 05:51 pm (UTC)If Pennsylvania is one of the states that they operate in, I would recommend IDT for basic phone service. They have an all-you-can-talk local and long distance (US) plan, which, inclusive of all fees and taxes, costs me $58/month. Note that Verizon Freedom advertises a price which is less than that, but does not include taxes and mandatory fees...
Canada is 5 cents/minute, other international calls are about on a par with anyone else.
On the other hand, maybe you do want a good cell plan. $60 /month will buy you two cell phones sharing 500 minutes a month, with free inbound calls. The phones themselves cost extra. (www.verizonwireless.com)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-29 05:55 pm (UTC)Phone number portability is universal; that's not a discriminating point among options.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-29 06:01 pm (UTC)I also use my cellphone a heck of alot. I pay about $50 a month (Cingular) for my phone and have about 1500 minutes per month with unlimited weekends.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-29 06:28 pm (UTC)That said, my land line is about $14/month, and I think the only extra I have is "number portability" (taking your number with you when you move). You can opt out of that too if you want, but it's cheap so I didn't bother. On the other hand, to get that low I had to go for one of the charge-per-call plans. They charge me seven cents per local daytime weekday call or something, and I've got 25 cents of free allowance per month. Since I'm never at home during the day during the week, I usually don't go over that.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:voip and cell
Date: 2005-06-29 11:20 pm (UTC)For what it's worth, Laura and I considered the same thing (cell for long-distance). It works okay for me, but I think Laura really prefers making long distance calls on the cordless telephone rather than the cell phone. Consequently, we may drop back to a basic cell plan on both phones until the contract's up. It's not worth it to us unless we're both using the same system.
As far as cell companies go, $20/month seems to be the minimum for a normal plan. Virgin Mobile has a pre-paid plan that uses Sprint's network and makes you buy $20 worth of minutes (between 80 and 200 minutes, depending on how you use them) every three months. $7/month isn't bad for a light user. If we could get -any- Sprint coverage where we live, we'd still be using the Virgin Mobile phones.
Re: voip and cell
From: