cellio: (sca)
[personal profile] cellio
A question has come up among some SCA folks, and I'm interested in hearing a broader perspective. Particularly because I've been a peer for a while and have become less active in recent years, it's possible I'm a bit out of touch.

Non-peers: to what extent do you look up to peers (define "look up" however you like)? Are you negatively affected (again, define how you like) if a peer does something bad?

Peers and non-peers: if a peer does something bad, is that significantly worse to you than if a non-peer did it? To what extent does the behavior of an individual peer reflect on his order or on the peerage in general? Does the answer vary based on what the peer did?

I'll post my own thoughts later; I want to hear others' first.

Clarification: "bad" = "behaves badly", not "produces substandard work". Sorry I didn't make that more clear.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-12 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com
What, to the mailing list?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-12 08:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dagonell.livejournal.com
To anywhere where I can read the thread?
-- Dagonell

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-12 08:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com
Ah. I don't believe the list is archived, and I don't save that list.

Sorry. If you know Robin Gallowglass, he hosts the list on his site, and he can tell you if there is a history available. If there is, but only to members, let me know. I can go digging....

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-13 03:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com
Look under June 2005, I think. If I recall, the subject line (at least for part of it) was "Pithing Peers". I paraphrase Shylock at one point. :-)

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags