tinkering with clocks
Oct. 30th, 2005 03:35 pmI understand the motivation to re-align the window of daylight to fit one's preferences, but that's doomed because we don't all have the same preferences (so the strongest lobby wins) and it's not as if clock-tinkering can actually extend the amount of light in the day. It might be wiser to just admit that noon comes at noon and sometimes that means dark mornings or dark evenings, and suck it up. Do we really need sunsets at close to 10PM in June? Does that get you anything that you can't get enough of with a 9PM sunset? And what's the harm of a 5:30 sunset in late October instead of a 6:30 one? If you work normal hours that extra hour of light probably doesn't let you do anything enjoyable (you're on your way home or eating dinner, most likely), and kids have been out of school for a couple hours by then so they've had plenty of running-around-outside time.
On Thursday I drove to morning services in pitch dark, and I had to consciously dawdle in leading the service so that the sun would rise before the first prayer that must be said in "the morning" hit. I don't know what this group will do next year, when DST continues through November. The minyan is when it is so people can get to work on time.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-31 03:52 pm (UTC)No time changes at all, whether we settled on all-standard or all-DST, would be better than switching, I think. Schools, employers, etc might be more motivated to make changes to accommodate the seasons, which is a better solution than imposing a change on everyone regardless of what it messes up. (I find the medication issue in hospitals (raised by