cellio: (star)
[personal profile] cellio
Our local Jewish newspaper had an article this week on the Conservative movement's recent big conference. Now mind, this newspaper also covered the Reform movement's biennial a few weeks back and, I'm told, blew things rather out of proportion, fixating on one small part of the plenary speech as if it was the whole thing. So maybe that's what's going on here. I hope.

This article said, essentially, that there is serious debate within the Conservative movement about whether it should be, or view itself as, a halachic movement. WTF? I thought that was part of the core definition of the movement. From this article, it sounds like there are some in the movement (who are big enough to rate mike time at the convention) who feel that, say, keeping kosher or Shabbat isn't as important as making people feel comfortable (as if that dichotomy actually exists).

I'm kind of curious about what was actually discussed and what has mainstream backing as opposed to being out on the fringes.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-19 03:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sanpaku.livejournal.com
The book defined the movement as halachic. The disagreements (positions A, B, C etc.) are on the sources of authority, as there's no certified Conservative position on what exactly happened at Sinai. Debates over dogma are different than debates over practical observance and ritual. Related to one another, but different.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags