random bits

[cellio]

Now there's an odd failure mode. Tonight I opened a book I bought recently (new) and found that it begins on page 41. Nothing was torn out; it appears to be a binding error. I guess I should have checked sooner (I bought it a couple months ago), but it's a torah commentary on Exodus, which we start this week, so I didn't need it before now. Fortunately, Amazon has an extended return period for books bought late in the year, so they'll exchange it and I don't even have to pay to ship it back. Yay.

Dani has decided to tackle the vast collection of Magic: The Gathering cards (most of which are his, but the older cards are mine). We haven't played in years; I would consider playing again in a simplified world, but they lost me when not only were there 6000 different cards, but they decided that many of the commons needed four different types of art. When I can't easily track what my opponent has in play, I lose interest. I understand that it's worse now; Dani says they are still publishing expansions and making money at it. After 12 or 13 years of this, I wonder how many cards there are now. (For comparison, the basic game, the one I played in the beta edition, had 300 cards. The first, and best, expansion set added, I think, about 75. Things went downhill from there.)

A few links:

These "new rules" might be incorrectly attributed (the reason they're on Snopes), but they sure are funny.

Advice from hindsight (from unspace).

This biscotti recipe sounds easy enough to try (from cookingengineer).

The origins of the great war of 2007 (link from rjlippincott).

Aieee. As tsjafo comments, I wouldn't trust the government with a pill that can alter memories. Granted, they're a long way from erasure, but I still don't trust that sort of technology in the hands of anyone with the power to compel -- in which category I would also place health providers, 'cause they're mostly owned by the insurance companies.

Comments

[metahacker.livejournal.com]

PS: 6000 MtG cards is not that far off. Best estimate I can find is 7943, based on searching the card database (http://gatherer.wizards.com/) for 'a' and 'e' and stuff like that.

I gave up when they invented the Shadow power, which was defined as:
Shadow: All cards in this expansion automatically beat anyone without this expansion. You must now buy all of this expansion.*
It was a bit too obvious. I occasionally consider selling my old cards; I'd probably get somewhere in the $100-500 range if I spent the time to do it right, but....eh.

(* I might have the wording wrong.)

[cellio]

I guess I gave up before then, because that name doesn't ring a bell. Sounds obnoxious, though. (I think the last expansion I bought any of was Ice Age.)

A few years ago I sold my 20 most valuable cards (as best we could tell) for a total of $1000. There could be several hundred dollars' worth still in the crates, but identifying them and implementing the sales might be hard. I've definitely already done my cherry-picking.

($1000, by the way, is substantially more than I ever spent on the game, so that worked out for me. I never bought individual cards, only expansion packs and decks.)

[metahacker.livejournal.com]

Congrats! I have some pretty valuable cards lying around -- on paper. But I despair of actually getting any real money for them. So it's nice to hear of a success story in making money off of old cards.

(The "jungle" expansion that introduced Shadow -- I forget the name -- was about 3 after Ice Age.)

[cellio]

I was surprised that I could get that much. I sold them singly on eBay and got approximately the going rates for cards that had definitely been played. (Dani did some research first to set asking prices and we watched other auctions for a couple weeks before I listed mine.)

If it's worth your trouble to do the current research, you might be able to collect some of that money the same way I did. There were definitely people who would buy non-pristine cards. I assume there still are, though we might be farther down from the peak now. (I definitely didn't sell at the peak time.)

[dagonell.livejournal.com]

I had to do a cataloging project last semester for a library science class. I chose to catalog Magic cards. I came up with a count of 7694, so considering the number of expansion sets they produce each year, that's probably right in the ball park.
-- Dagonell

[cellio]

Did you catalog every card that ever was, or every card that's in print? Did you catalog the multiple versions of the same card as one entry, or one per version?

Perhaps that 6000 that I pulled out of thin air was off by a factor of two, then. I had this feeling that at the time I quit playing there were about that many cards, but maybe after the first 3000 you just lose track. :-)

[dagonell.livejournal.com]

Premise was that it was the potential inventory for a game store, so every card that ever existed. Multiple versions were classified separately because the database could be searched by artist. I got an A in the project. The teacher said another student had done MtG two years prior. My database was better.
-- Dagonell
BTW, I had to *design* the database. Actual number of cards entered into the database, 5. :)