random bits
Jan. 18th, 2006 09:54 pmDani has decided to tackle the vast collection of Magic: The Gathering cards (most of which are his, but the older cards are mine). We haven't played in years; I would consider playing again in a simplified world, but they lost me when not only were there 6000 different cards, but they decided that many of the commons needed four different types of art. When I can't easily track what my opponent has in play, I lose interest. I understand that it's worse now; Dani says they are still publishing expansions and making money at it. After 12 or 13 years of this, I wonder how many cards there are now. (For comparison, the basic game, the one I played in the beta edition, had 300 cards. The first, and best, expansion set added, I think, about 75. Things went downhill from there.)
A few links:
These "new rules" might be incorrectly attributed (the reason they're on Snopes), but they sure are funny.
Advice
from hindsight (from
unspace).
This biscotti
recipe sounds easy enough to try (from
cookingengineer).
The
origins of the great war of 2007 (link from
rjlippincott).
Aieee. As
tsjafo comments, I wouldn't trust the government with
a
pill that can alter memories. Granted, they're a long way from erasure,
but I still don't trust that sort of technology in the hands of anyone with
the power to compel -- in which category I would also place health providers,
'cause they're mostly owned by the insurance companies.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 03:07 am (UTC)It happens more often than you might think =(
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 03:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 03:17 am (UTC)I gave up when they invented the Shadow power, which was defined as:
Shadow: All cards in this expansion automatically beat anyone without this expansion. You must now buy all of this expansion.*
It was a bit too obvious. I occasionally consider selling my old cards; I'd probably get somewhere in the $100-500 range if I spent the time to do it right, but....eh.
(* I might have the wording wrong.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 03:18 am (UTC)M:TG
Date: 2006-01-19 03:28 am (UTC)Yeah I got into it when it was beta.. and one year I sold most of my cards to pay for my tuition. Good move on my part. I still have my beta Black Lotus which apparently is the most valuable card of all...
I have no idea how it plays anymore - there were too many cards to think about. And I was bored of it.
I know someone who works in their art department - he designed a few of their newer cards.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 04:05 am (UTC)A few years ago I sold my 20 most valuable cards (as best we could tell) for a total of $1000. There could be several hundred dollars' worth still in the crates, but identifying them and implementing the sales might be hard. I've definitely already done my cherry-picking.
($1000, by the way, is substantially more than I ever spent on the game, so that worked out for me. I never bought individual cards, only expansion packs and decks.)
Re: M:TG
Date: 2006-01-19 04:09 am (UTC)I never had a Black Lotus, though I did get to see one once.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 04:09 am (UTC)(The "jungle" expansion that introduced Shadow -- I forget the name -- was about 3 after Ice Age.)
Re: M:TG
Date: 2006-01-19 04:12 am (UTC)Um. Yes. Sell it -- $1000-$2000 (http://www.gatheringground.com/store/showproductdetails.asp?product=29521) seems to be the price range right now(!). For that one card.
Unless you like continuing in investing in bubbles, that is.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 04:16 am (UTC)-- Dagonell
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 04:27 am (UTC)Perhaps that 6000 that I pulled out of thin air was off by a factor of two, then. I had this feeling that at the time I quit playing there were about that many cards, but maybe after the first 3000 you just lose track. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 04:31 am (UTC)If it's worth your trouble to do the current research, you might be able to collect some of that money the same way I did. There were definitely people who would buy non-pristine cards. I assume there still are, though we might be farther down from the peak now. (I definitely didn't sell at the peak time.)
Re: M:TG
Date: 2006-01-19 04:43 am (UTC)Umm, tempting, considering I have some other rare ones too like my Time Walk and my Time Twister. I kept them for sentimentality reasons but really they sit in an old cookie box and really no one cares about them anymore except for me and my glory gaming days...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 05:51 am (UTC)The most commonly played formats only permit ~300-1500 of the most recently printed cards. It isn't difficult to jump back into the game. Of course, the bad news is that most of the cards you can acquire now will be nearly unusuable 2 years from now since they won't be legal in any commonly sanctioned format except "Extended".
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 09:04 am (UTC)If you haven't, I highly recommend reading Jonathan Lethem's first (published) novel, "Gun, With Occasional Music."
It's a surreal murder mystery with "film noir" style setting along with science fiction elements. It's got scientifically-evolved animals, babies that aren't really babies, and drugs that mess with your mind.
I can't explain more, not just because it'd give away the specialness of the book but because... it just has to be read.
Anyway. That's what popped into my head when you mentioned that drug.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 02:58 pm (UTC)-- Dagonell
BTW, I had to *design* the database. Actual number of cards entered into the database, 5. :)
Re: M:TG
Date: 2006-01-19 03:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 04:05 pm (UTC)Keeping the playable set small is good; planned obsolescence, well, keeps Wizards in business. :-) I never did much tournament play anyway, so I suppose a gaming group could set its own rules to keep the set of cards (and money spent) within whatever parameters it chose.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-19 04:06 pm (UTC)Re: M:TG
Date: 2006-09-09 04:54 pm (UTC)Re: M:TG
Date: 2006-09-09 06:28 pm (UTC)Re: M:TG
Date: 2006-09-09 06:39 pm (UTC)Re: M:TG
Date: 2006-09-10 02:04 am (UTC)