![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
games day
We started by playing Talisman, which was probably a decent game before they published the gazillions of expansion sets. This is a board game based on fantasy role-playing; in the basic game your character progresses through the three rings of the board, until someone reaches the center and (usually) wins. (Other players can still interfere with the leader; it's not an automatic win. But the player who gets to the center certainly has advantages.) The original game had around a dozen different characters, I think, and a balanced set of encounters, magic items, spells, and special events.
The expansion sets added several game boards, new characters, and new cards (encounters, items, etc). We only played with one additional board (the dungeon), but we didn't sort out all the extra cards other than to kill one identifiable set as we encountered them (Timescape). I don't own this game and I don't know what expansions were involved, but the result was pretty weird, and it was the most unsatisfying game of Talisman I've ever played. (I was so-so on the game before today, so I don't know when I'll be willing to play again.) We all experienced a lot of thrashing; after two hours I had yet to have a fight with a monster, for instance, and I never succeeded in raising any of my stats. We saw a lot of cards of the "this card remains on the board for the rest of the game" variety, which reduced the number of spaces on which cards could be drawn, which made it harder to get monsters to fight. After about four hours we gave up. One player was having enough success that we could all believe that he would win if we were willing to play it out, so we declared him the winner.
Someone else had brought a chariot-racing game that he said can work well for three players, so we split into two groups. Four of us played Puerto Rico (one first-time player), and this, too, turned out to be a weird game. When we ran out of settlers (ending the game), we were not as advanced as we should have been, and the final scores ranged from 20 to 31. (I had 28.) Usually in a four-player game all the scores are in the 30s and 40s, at least in my limited experience. It wasn't just that people were playing the mayor too often, though there was some of that. There wasn't a lot of money in the game, which limited building, which trickled down. I'm not quite sure how that happened. It wasn't the total lack of satisfaction that Talisman was; I had fun even while realizing that it was playing oddly.
The chariot-racers were still going, so then we pulled out a game that was new to all of us, called Tsuro: The Game of the Path. This is a nifty game, and I'd like to play it more. Play is on a 6x6 board; most of the 36 positions will ultimately be occupied by tiles. Each square tile is divided into 9 sections, so there are 8 edge positions, two on each side. Each tile contains a different set of paths connecting those 8 points in some ways -- so the simplest pattern is a tic-tac-toe board, but most of them involve curves that criss-cross or connect points on adjacent sides. Paths can cross each other but not fork; there is always one unambiguous connection for each of the eight positions.
Player tokens start on the edges of the board (any edge point you want). On your turn, you play a tile adjacent to your piece and then move all affected pieces as far along their paths as you can. (So if someone else is also adjacent to the tile you play, both pieces move.) If you go off the board, you're out -- so you're trying to control your path, but as the tiles start to come together you can find yourself pushed to places you never expected to be. A game takes about 15 minutes, so this is a good "waiting around for other people" game, though I would happily play it for its own sake too. It also supports up to 8 players, which is useful.
Finally, we played a few rounds of Trans Europa, a quickie train game. It's the same game as Trans America, which we've played several times, but on a differnet map. Cities on the board are divided into five (color-coded) zones; at the beginning of each round you draw one card of each color and those are the cities you have to connect together with track. The zones in Trans Europa feel more spread-out than they do in Trans America; maybe it's just that we haven't learned the quirks of this particular map. As with Trans America, a game takes about 20 minutes.
no subject
-- Dagonell
no subject
Tsuro is nominally Chinese -- well, I'm inferring from the kanji and the Chinese dragon in the art; I didn't read the box or rules. I have no idea whether it was invented last year, last decade, or last century -- or it could be 500 years old for all I know, but I'd want to see some documentation before propegating such a claim.
no subject
Tsuro: The Game of the Path is often mistaken for an English-language reprint. Because of its beautiful oriental theme, many have questioned the origin of this elegantly designed board game. Gameplay was developed by mathematician Tom McMurchie, who, after putting together a simple game that was fun and easy to play, decided to team up with WizKids.
So, not so old.
Having said that, I've found some of the worst scholarship in the SCA has to do with board games. Lots of people haul out Cathedral as if it were authentic, and contrariwise there's the infamous Complete Anachronist which claimed that current chess rules were not period. (According to http://www.chess-poster.com/english/chesmayne/brief_notes_on_the_history_of_chess_1500.htm , castling, the most recent rule of chess, was introduced in the 1540's.)
no subject
Having said that, I've found some of the worst scholarship in the SCA has to do with board games.
Is it worse, or do we tend to be more sensitive in the areas we specialize in? (I'm asking, not challenging you.) I suspect that for every person who thinks Cathedral is period ("it must be -- it has castles!") there's someone who thinks that Korabushka is a period dance and someone who thinks "Witch of the Westmereland" is a period ballad. Though, that said, it probably is worse in fields where there are relatively few SCA experts -- if Joe Random SCAdian never runs into someone who knows about games but does run into someone who knows about dance, he'll have more of a chance to get the Korabushka clue than the chess clue, maybe.
no subject
The website you quote mentions some varients of castling (like a two move version) in 1555 and 1561 and then goes on to say:
1600 Castling established as a single move; still regional variations.
1620 Castling; modern version of castling established in France.
1640 Castling; modern version of castling established in England.
(I should probably try and dig out what they used as a source at some point)
Aside from that, I do agree that there is some pretty bad scholarship out there (just look at Tablero de Jesus)
no subject
In general, the rules about draws have changed several times since period, with some endings (rook & bishop vs. rook) being extended at the end of the 20th century. I don't know if there have been additional changes since then.
no subject
no subject
It felt like the worst distributions in Trans Europa would be worse than the worst ones in Trans America, but the game is not fundamentally different in any way. The page on BoardGameGeek for the game has photos of the game board, by the way.
no subject
Ah, if they have a photo, then I can easily simulate the game with some nice hex paper (http://users.livejournal.com/merle_/71817.html), using the old Trans America pieces. Excellent -- that'll take up a lot less room!
There was some European rail game I played once that was quite excellent, but it was a 3-4 player game, and took ages. Both building tracks and delivering cargo. I think that crayons were involved. One of these days I'll track it down...
no subject
The other game you're thinking of sounds like Euro Rails. This was the first of the crayon/rail games I played, and it's one of my favorites. The publishers have produced similar games in other settings, including a fantasy one called Iron Dragon. With these ones, unlike the Trans games, the variations do sometimes introduce new challenges or at least interesting quirks. I've heard that the Australian and Indian games aren't very interesting, but the Japanese one was a challenge with its limited access points the one time I played it, and Lunar Rails is unusual in playing on a (simulated) globe, not just one continent. Iron Dragon introduces ships and also foremen, which give you different advantages in rail-building. (Which one you want is governed by where you're currently building most of your track.)
In all of these games, you are both building track (that's where the crayons come in) and moving goods. Delivering goods gets you money (with which you can build more track); the victory condition is both a certain amount of money and your own track connecting most of the major cities. Over time you learn when to build (you'll need it again, or you need it for those connections) and when to rent time on other people's tracks. Naturally, payment for goods goes up as the distance required to get them there goes up.
All of these games support up to six players. I think it takes at least four players to produce a satisfying game. Our rule of thumb (based on Euro Rails and Iron Dragon, the ones we play most often) is to allow one hour per player.
no subject
As my current gaming is with just one other person, I'm probably not going to rush out to buy it. Most strategy/economic games don't work well at all with just two people. But it's nice to know the name so I can stop worrying about that.
If you like rail games, Ticket To Ride is a nice game, somewhere between Trans America and Euro Rails in terms of complexity and game length. I believe it is limited to five players, but plays well with two. A two player game takes maybe an hour.
no subject
Thanks for the pointer to Ticket To Ride. I hadn't realized that it was a candidate for smaller numbers of players; that and my liking the games you compared it to suggest I should check it out.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I can see that. I've only played Japan once, so I don't have much experience with it. (I find that the first two or three times I play any of these, I'm learning the specific properties of the map and routes.)
I've never played Great Britain. (I'm not sure I knew about it, now that I think about it.) Thanks for the heads-up.
no subject
no subject
There was also a group there playing Talisman with all the expansions, plus an outer ring expansion that one of them had designed. No clue how long their game ran...
We've been playing Ticket to Ride and Ticket to Ride: Europe recently? Have you tried them yet? I'd be curious to hear how they compare to the other train games (I've not gotten to play any of the other ones yet)
no subject
Because, heaven knows, you can never have too many game-lengthening boards, decoy endings, etc. :-)
I haven't tried Ticket to Ride (either flavor), but after hearing positive reviews from people here and from