cheap Macs?
Oct. 15th, 2006 09:31 pmDear LJ brain trust,
I'd like to get an inexpensive laptop. It won't be my main machine; it's for travel and other situations where portability is useful. So it doesn't need to be studly; it just needs to be reliable and support basic tools like Firefox, emacs, SSH, FTP, and that sort of thing.
This would be a prime opportunity to explore the Macintosh, which some of my friends rave about, except for one little thing: I can get a (new) Dell laptop for around $400, but Macs start at $1100. Is there some less-expensive option I'm missing?
I'd like to get an inexpensive laptop. It won't be my main machine; it's for travel and other situations where portability is useful. So it doesn't need to be studly; it just needs to be reliable and support basic tools like Firefox, emacs, SSH, FTP, and that sort of thing.
This would be a prime opportunity to explore the Macintosh, which some of my friends rave about, except for one little thing: I can get a (new) Dell laptop for around $400, but Macs start at $1100. Is there some less-expensive option I'm missing?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-16 02:23 am (UTC)Used.
Not ideal, but if you know someone who's upgrading their iBook (as opposed to replacing it because it's died the death), my experience has been that people are glad to get anything for an old machine. The down side is that you probably won't be able to get warranty coverage (which is delightful and irreplaceable when it's necessary).
If what you really want is an occasional travel machine and you're currently a Windows user, I'd stick with the Dell, since the handling will be familiar. Apples are very friendly for new users, but unless you're going to be using it fairly regularly, there's still a learning curve you can trip over, and you don't want to be tripping when you're ... tripping, as it were. Now, I'm a major Mac proselytizer, but it doesn't sound like your situation is ideal for making a joyous conversion. :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-16 02:31 am (UTC)Everyone has different experiences, but my last three computers have been Gateways and wouldn't consider switching. I've had good luck with them and on the rare occassions I've needed to call their service department, I was pleased with the help I got. (I think Dells might be cheaper, though.)
My parents purchased a new Mac over a year ago that they've sent back again and again to be fixed. Just last week, it was finally determined that a key component had never been installed.
It was hard to switch from Mac to PC, but now I just about go through the roof when I'm forced to use my parents' computer. Then again, I think you're much more technical than I am.
Good luck with your computer shopping!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-16 03:14 am (UTC)On the other hand, I actually bought that $400 Dell laptop for Jill, because she needed a Windows machine, and frankly it's less than delightful. So if you decide against a Mac, you might want to shell out a little more than the bare minimum for your Windows machine. (Then again, I could be biased by my intense dislike of installing stupid Windows patches every 10 minutes. Since you mostly want to run free software, I guess you could just put Linux on it and maybe it would be better.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Tangentially ...
From:Re: Tangentially ...
From:ubuntu
From:Re: ubuntu
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-16 03:29 am (UTC)It sounds like what you want - it's good for note taking and internet access plus itunes, but I wouldn't play a game on it.
Note: there is as far as I know no tech support for this machine - it came with no install discs or information, and did come with a lot of crapware. But, cheap and easy.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-16 03:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-16 03:44 am (UTC)Duncan wants a game machine, so that will have to wait for more money. Lots more money.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-17 01:52 pm (UTC)A note of caution about used Macs...
Date: 2006-10-20 03:55 am (UTC)That said, I have to keep buying new Macs anyway, because Apple has historically made no effort to ensure backwards-compatibiility for third-party software in successive releases of the Mac's operating system. The software that runs on my immortal Mac Plus (System 6, I think) won't run on the iBook, nor will the iBook's software run on the Methuselan Mac; the software that runs on the iBook (OS 9) won't run on my current work Mac (G4 Tiger), and vice-versa. If I ever upgrade to an Intel Mac, the software I'm using now won't run on it. New software for the Intel machine won't run on my G4.
No backwards compatibility is probably the main reason why most software developers never took the Mac seriously until the UNIX/Intel release. A good developer can get a twenty-year-old Windows program running on XP. Not so with Macs -- at least not until the Unix/Intel release.
I think the important thing to keep in mind is that if you're planning to buy a used Mac, it will likely be a Motorola machine, and you'll be limited to a narrow subset of software. New software for the Intel Mac might not run on it, and developers are unlikely to release upgrades or write new programs for a what is essentially a dead hardware platform. A used G4 will probably meet the needs you have now. But if your needs change in the next few years or something really great comes along that you want to use, you'll be screwed. Yes, the machine will last forever -- a "forever" in which you're stuck with whatever was current the year you bought it.
Re: A note of caution about used Macs...
From: