I believe the future tense of "l'havin" (to understand) is "avin" (as in "ani lo avin [et] ha lashon"). "Evneh" (which you have there) is "I will build."
If that's "sefer torah" in the last paragraph, the spelling is samech-peh-heh (not sin), and I think your peh is upside down.
I think "oolai" is aleph-vav-lamed-yod. (If not, it's an ayin instead of the aleph, but there's definitely one of those two there. If it weren't, it would look like an "and..." starting word, rather than a word itself.)
Your handwriting is a lot better than mine ever was in all my years of Hebrew school, if that helps at all. And I could never remember how to make half of those final-letters in cursive...
no subject
A couple of thoughts: shavu`ah ("week") has an `ayin, not an alef, and it might be better in the last sentence to say bli targum rather than
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
im vs im
Re: im vs im
no subject
I believe the future tense of "l'havin" (to understand) is "avin" (as in "ani lo avin [et] ha lashon"). "Evneh" (which you have there) is "I will build."
If that's "sefer torah" in the last paragraph, the spelling is samech-peh-heh (not sin), and I think your peh is upside down.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)