random bits
Sometime before the end of Daylight Spending Time, I want to replace
my car. My current favorite is the Honda Fit, but that's based on
specs and reviews; I've never driven one. (So I want to go to a dealer,
but I know that once I do that I set things in motion, so I should do
this when I've set aside time for car shopping.) I just checked
edmunds.com and was surprised to find that people are currently paying
sticker price. Either the recent kudos from Consumer Reports
had a real effect, or there's a shortage, or something else is going
on that I haven't thought of. Maybe I should wait a few months and
see if that changes.
Aside: in PA do you pay sales tax on the purchase price of the new car, or on the purchase price minus your trade-in? Last time my trade-in was 15 years old so I didn't notice nor overly care. This time, according to Edmunds, my trade-in is worth close to $10k, so this matters. (I try to always have a bottom-line figure in mind before walking into a dealership.)
I got a bizarre phone call recently. The caller was an attorney
(he didn't say with whom), and he was calling because he had found
my name on a list of people who had worked on DCE, the Distributed
Computing Environment (which I did from 1990 to around 1995).
He said only that he was researching "prior art". He asked what my
role on the project was and I told him (peon for one of several
companies working on this joint project). He asked how
familiar I was with the code base, and I said "well, it's been 12
years, umm". I apologized for not being able to help him more, and
he said it's ok; he's got a couple hundred names. (Belatedly I
wondered where he got his lists and how many interns or whatnot
he used to get current phone numbers for all of them.)
Last night at
lorimelton and
ralphmelton's
excellent Saint-Patrick's party, I ran into someone else who worked
on that project. I asked if she'd gotten a similar call or if
he'd lost steam before getting to the "S"s in his list of names,
and this was news to her. It occurs to me now that hers is a more
common name than mine, so he might be filtering his list based
on probability of getting the right person.
Someone recently commented to me that with the growth of the internet,
Google is becoming less useful as a way of finding answers because of
all the junk you get in the results (such as fora where someone else
asked the same question but no one has answered). I said that for
more targetted queries, I'm trying to train myself to go first to
Wikipedia -- which might not have the answer, but is likely to have
outbound links, so someone else has culled the search results for me,
maybe. For broader queries and when I just plain forget, I still use
Google.
As an example, I said (while feeding drugs to my cat), I wonder how antibiotics work. That is, they always tell you to take the full course even if the symptoms go away earlier; why is that? So, off to Wikipedia I went, and came up empty. And thence to Google, where I found a page on howstuffworks.com called "how do antibiotics work?" (bingo!) -- with no answer to my question. So I still don't know. It's not important enough for me to invest real effort (maybe I'll ask my vet next time I see her), but I was disappointed to fail so soon after describing what I thought was a good approach.
That aside, though, Google and Wikipedia have made it much easier to go from "I wonder..." to "oh, that's the answer", which means I'm much more likely to actually chase down answers to random questions a little bit. If I had the internet in my pocket that would be even better, as I wouldn't lose the things that come up in conversation while out.
Short takes:
I accept responsibility for the rain earlier this week; the karmic consequences of the carwash were worth it for the desalination. However, the drop in temperature that turned the rain to noisy rain and thence to snow is not my fault. (I think the noisy rain was freezing rain rather than sleet. I learned the difference Friday when I got curious.)
Earlier this week Erik was not very interested in food, but after a day or so of that (and getting fluids) he was back to having an appetite. Then yesterday he ate two cans of food, approximately 10% of his body weight. What's up with that? Today is back to normal. I'm not complaining (I want him to eat), but I'm puzzled.
Security
audit of Hogwarts, from
securitymentor2.
I am interested in finding movies (or TV shows) in Hebrew with English subtitles. (I need to improve my comprehension of the spoken language.) Bonus points for science fiction, fantasy, and non-police drama. Ultra-bonus points for anything I've already seen in English (B5 or West Wing dubs, anyone?). Anti-points for romances, fast-moving action flicks, and children's shows unless they also have something of interest to adults (e.g. yes for Rocky and Bullwinkle, no for Barney). I don't care about DVD regions. Anyone have any thoughts on where to look for such things?
Antibiotics
My sister always asks Christian fundies who preach at her whether they finish their antibiotics once they feel better. After all, if there's no evolution..... :)
Re: Antibiotics
I was wondering if they kill the germs outright but only a few at a time, or if they slowly kill them (disabling them in the process) and you need the full dose of poison to finish 'em off, or if they inhibit reproduction, or... something else I haven't thought of yet.
Re: Antibiotics
Re: Antibiotics
My vet currently has me "pulsing" Erik with antibiotics (N days on, M days off) for his hepatitis. If you get N wrong, though, it seems like that could make things worse. I wonder if there are medical (as opposed to economic) arguments against just giving them to him all the time. Mind, I'd rather not spend the money, but I'd also rather not make my cat worse.
Re: Antibiotics
Re: Antibiotics
-- Dagonell
Re: Antibiotics
no subject
they always tell you to take the full course even if the symptoms go away earlier; why is that?
IANA doctor, pharmacologist, or biologist of any sort, but this is what i remember being told when i asked a similar question:
does that make sense?
-steve
no subject
My favorites were "Walk on Water", "Sima Vaknin Machshefa" (stupid but cute IMHO), "Bonjour Monsieur Shlomi", and "Yana's Friends".
no subject
no subject
no subject
My Google searches now tend to the multi-step. Try to choose a term with the right specificity. If I get too many irrelevant results, add additional terms and/or remove any term that is coming up frequently in results that aren't what I'm looking for. I also use a lot of phrases, where appropriate.
And my favourite Google search of late (when I've been doing some Wikipedia editing) is to Google for that fact that doesn't look quite right (like the hockey player who supposedly claimed a February 30th birthday) and add "-wikipedia" to eliminate most of the Wikipedia-sourced pages.
Many of my Googles are for specific information. (In fact, the last one in my browser's search box is: "international musicland" hours, trying to find the hours for a music store in the city to see if it would be open tomorrow night when my father gets off work. No luck: the store has a web site that doesn't give their hours!)
no subject
For medical questions I use http://medlineplus.gov. It's sponsored by the US National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health. There is information from a variety of sources all in one place.
I found the following via MedlinePlus. It's on the Merck website: http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec17/ch192/ch192a.html
Taking Antibiotics
For severe bacterial infections, antibiotics are usually first given by injection. When the infection is under control, antibiotics can then be taken by mouth. Less severe infections can be treated from the start with oral antibiotics. Antibiotics need to be taken until the infecting organism is eliminated from the body, which may be days after the symptoms disappear. Antibiotics are rarely given for fewer than 5 days (an exception is certain uncomplicated urinary tract infections). Discontinuing treatment too soon can result in a relapse of infection or the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
no subject
Wikipedia's search isn't very good, so it's not the place to go with a broad multi-term query. But, increasingly, if there's a specific fact I'm trying to chase down, that'll get it for me more quickly than Google. As with everything on the net, though, just because someone says it doesn't make it so. :-)
You got some good answers...
Tonight, I went to a lecture on bird flu and didn't sit there designing a more lethal virus. That, in my book, is a good lecturer!
no subject
It's been the Hot New Car for a while now -- the reviews when it came out were stellar, and it's still the leading member of the new breed of really small cars. I remember when it first came out, and the folks on NPR raved about it: the description that stuck with me was that it felt like being in an Accord, despite being a far smaller vehicle. And given that the Yaris has gotten crappy reviews (and the new Smart car worse than that), it looks even better by comparison.
So yes: I suspect there's a shortage. There are always a couple of cars that are hot enough that you have to pay sticker for them...
Someone recently commented to me that with the growth of the internet, Google is becoming less useful as a way of finding answers because of all the junk you get in the results (such as fora where someone else asked the same question but no one has answered).
I'm honestly not sure that that's true -- I think expectations have simply risen. I mean, yes: there are many cases of the question-only-asked that I find in such a query. But often, if I trawl through a few of those, I'll find one where the question *is* answered.
Overall, I'd say my success rate on Google hasn't changed much in the past few years. The *nature* of the failures has changed, but it's mainly that, whereas in the past I would have found nothing even relevant, now I might find those unanswered questions you refer to. But everyone's getting so used to the "I wanna know now!" information age, that they've forgotten about the fact that, just six or seven years ago, it would have been inconceivable to find answers to anything so fast.
That said, Wikipedia is proving to be a remarkably useful resource, and my usage of it has been ramping up. (Enough that I've started to donate to them, on the Shareware principle.) For all that people lash out at it for its inaccuracies, it's still that case that something that comprehensive that's only 90% accurate is still damned useful, especially if one has the critical thinking skills to weed out the crap. It's not the place for nitpicky details, but when I want a general overview of a subject (even a fairly minor subject), it's usually the best place to look...