parsha bit: Emor
May. 3rd, 2007 09:14 amThis week's parsha repeats the laws for when one wounds another, saying
"eye for eye, hand for hand, wound for wound" and so on. The talmud
says not to take this literally and institutes fines instead, bringing
various linguistic arguments to justify the change. Ibn Ezra, citing
the Sa'adia Gaon, instead brings a practical argument: what if one
man's vision is not equal to another's? Or what if someone causes
another to lose partial vision -- how would you know when you had
inflicted a like amount of damage? And, the Sa'adia says, this kind
of judgement is even harder in the case of wounds. Clearly, he says,
the Torah never meant this to describe physical punishment, as it would
be impossible to administer it fairly. (Ibn Ezra on Lev 24:17-22)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-04 12:41 am (UTC)What did you talk about, lo those many years ago, for your d'var torah? Or didn't you give one?