near misses in user interfaces
On my previous car, you move the lever up to turn on the wipers and down for a single pass. On my current car it's the reverse. That's taking some getting used to. Neither is obviously better; I wish the industry would just choose one.
Another in the "it's not just about you, mister designer" class: every microwave oven I've ever used has a numeric keypad, with "start" and "stop" buttons to either side of the "0". On the microwave at home, "start" is on the right. At work, it's on the left. As a result I get this wrong about one time in five. (It's not as if I -- or most users, I suspect -- actually read the button; we use positional memory, which works for numbers and fails for start/stop.) People change microwaves more often than they change cars, I suspect, so it would be nice if the industry would settle on a standard. Either one would be fine if it were predictable.

no subject
I, too, wonder why there isn't a standard by now.
no subject
Because of this, I've now driven off without my headlights on a half-dozen times. Hey, the dashboard lights are on, the headlights must be on, too, right?
no subject
no subject
different industries' standards
I didn't notice until I got a job that involved making lots of phone calls, often while typing/looking up phone numbers on the computer at the same time. For some reason I tend to make more 3 vs 9 and 1 vs 7 errors and fewer 2 vs 8 errors.
no subject
no subject
My Honda Fit lights the dashboard all the time. This means I have to look for the green "lights on" indicator (which is prominent), but at least it's consistent.
no subject
no subject
Re: different industries' standards
Does the computer keyboard mimic adding machines of yore? I can't remember. It seems to be consistent with pocket calculators.
Interface design
tires and microwaves
As for microwaves, I really want a microwave with two analog dials: one for time and a second for power. Kind of like the cheap ones that were common 15-20 years ago. I bought one last year that had a dial, but it wasn't what I hoped for. Rather than the old spring-loaded analog dial, this was more like a big mouse scroll wheel. Each "click" is another increment, and the increments are non-linear. The first five clicks are seconds. The next 5 are 5-second increments. The next ten or so are 10-second increments. Then 30 seconds. etc. So, a minute is about a half-turn. Five minutes is 3/4 turn. It takes about two minutes to heat a cold cup of coffee, and I can never hit the two minute mark without a lot of fiddling. I'd just press the "add minute" button twice, but it only works once per job. And, of course, they couldn't resist adding a bunch of other buttons and hiding the "start" button among them. I've successfully dialed in the time and then hit "cancel" more than once.
no subject
Re: Interface design
Or have used it enough that they've gotten used to its quirks and think it's perfectly reasonable to type control-alt-@ twice quickly to save a file. :-) I've seen both problems.
Or do you think that this is a conscious design, intended to increase the likelihood that you take your car in for service at a local Honda repair shop?
Or, as someone else suggested, designed to make you check all the tires while you've got the gauge out anyway. I hadn't considered tha possibility.
Re: tires and microwaves
Microwave: I, too, would like two dials; I haven't seen a dial in probably 20 years. The one you describe sounds like an attempt to be clever that misfired; yes, if you're cooking something for 10 minutes you don't want to have to turn and turn and turn and turn, but on the other hand, the precision of, say, 2:15 versus 2:00 or 2:30 can matter, and fiddling is a pain. I think (off the top of my head) that if I were doing it I might do concentric dials for minutes and seconds, let each go in both directions, and dispense with the 5-second unit entirely. But before I got that far in a real design, I would find out what kinds of times people most commonly enter and where the corner cases are.
no subject
no subject
no subject
My largest current problem is in using both Windows and OSX computers at the same time. When I had one at home and one at work, it was vaguely possible to retain correct muscle memory for each (at home I have a trackball on the left, at work, a mouse on the right, so there is some environmental cue). Now that I use both at home.. and sometimes VNC from one machine into the other.. outright confusion.
(quite accidentally and luckily, most keyboard shortcuts standard for one OS are benign on the other, but it is still very annoying)
It does seem like dots indicating which tire would have been appropriate. Weren't there cars over a decade ago that would show you on a diagram which door was not completely latched? I seem to recall having a Pontiac that did that.