daf bit: Ketuvot 61
Nov. 1st, 2007 09:06 amA mishna teaches: if a married man makes a vow of celibacy, Beit
Shammai says his wife must tolerate it for two weeks. Beit Hillel
says one week. Rav says that this is only so when the man specifies
a duration for the vow; if he does not, Rav says that both Shammai
and Hillel require him to immediately divorce his wife and pay her
ketubah. Samuel permits him to delay the divorce while looking for
a way to be excused from the vow. (61b)
(There is no discussion here of limits on the duration, but I'll bet there is later in the gemara. Oh, and I don't know who Samuel is.)
This same mishna also gives the requirements for how often a man owes his wife intercourse (if she wants it), by the way. It varies by occupation, ranging from daily for men who don't work at all to every six months for sailors. I don't see scholars on the list. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-01 04:56 pm (UTC)And kings are in the "once-a-day" category.
This is how we know that King Schlomo was blessed by G-d. Because he, alone among humans, was able to manage to satisfy 900 women per day.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-01 11:02 pm (UTC)I had assumed that most of the wives didn't require this of him every day. (Statistics will get it down to an average of about 500 a day, once we factor in niddah. If they can agree on weekly, that's about 72 per day. Even with all that hedging -- just when did the man have time to rule? :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-02 12:37 am (UTC)Which, for all SORTS of reasons is a truly horrific thought -- I can't imagine 900 simultaneous cases of PMS.
The important thing, I guess, would be to make sure to be able to truck enough snow down from the mountaintops to make 900 gallons of ice cream a month. Which would help, but since chocolate is a New World plant, I can't help but thinking that this must have been once of the most hellish events in the history of the world.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-02 02:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-01 11:52 pm (UTC)Or I could be remembering this entirely wrong. But I am fairly sure that it is a matter of debate as to whether A wife must be satisfied at least this often or if EVERY wife must be satisfied at least this often.