cellio: (talmud)
Monica ([personal profile] cellio) wrote2007-11-15 09:07 am
Entry tags:

daf bit: Ketuvot 75

A mishna discusses cases where a man can divorce his wife without paying her ketubah. One such case is if she is found to have certain bodily defects -- the defects that disqualify a priest can also disqualify a wife (if the husband chooses), according to the gemara. However, the mishna teaches, if the defect was visible the man has no recourse, and if she resides in a town with a public bath he has no recourse even if it was invisible. Why? Because it is presumed that he had his female relatives check her out before betrothing her. (75b)

(Aside: two pages later is the mishna that discusses the man's defects and when he can be compelled to divorce her.)

[identity profile] ralphmelton.livejournal.com 2007-11-15 06:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Divorce is an action done strictly by a man, not by a woman?

[identity profile] jerusha.livejournal.com 2007-11-15 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Are there bodily defects in this class that are invisible even when the person is undressed? If not, the "female relatives checked her out in the baths" doesn't count for much...

[identity profile] zevabe.livejournal.com 2007-11-16 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, one that is cited as an example of such is bad breath.

bus link, thank you

[identity profile] happyingreen.livejournal.com 2007-11-18 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks so much for the bus link. That will make life infinitely better.