Measured visual acuity depends on the equipment. What it also depends on (based on my own observation) is operator variation. Your vision score includes a judgement call by the person administering the test. Whether you get an extra point can depend on how quickly or how certainly you read a letter. When you say "um, I think it's an F -- no, wait, it's a P", what happens to your score is not well-defined.
This doesn't really matter for an individual patient with a consistent doctor (presumably what the test was designed for); what matters is not so much your raw score but whether and how it changes from year to year. But when that score is used for other purposes, like deciding who can drive and who can fly a plane, it gives me pause. According to today's eye test, if both of my eyes were as bad as my weaker one I would still be allowed to drive (albeit only during daylight). Yikes.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 05:38 pm (UTC)About a year ago, my vision took a sudden turn. I started getting the familiar headaches and optical migraines that first heralded my need for glasses. I went to an ophthamologist who told me that my vision was half a diopter better in each eye than what my glasses would predict. I have yet to hear a satisfying explanation. The best theory seems to be that this is a temporary improvement on the road to bifocals, but that's depressing so I grant it no credence.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: