random bits

Dec. 8th, 2007 11:08 pm
cellio: (mandelbrot-2)
[personal profile] cellio
Exhibit #342 supporting the case that Dani and I are well-matched: tonight's theoretical discussion of the proposition "lights timed for 35 MPH are also timed for 70 MPH". Well, that's pretty clearly false; the interesting discussion was of the reverse. It sure seems like lights timed for 70 MPH ought to also be timed for 35 MPH, but I don't think it's so even if you pile on simplifying assumptions like "green 50% of the time".


Remember when disk space cost a dollar a meg? And later it was a dollar a gig? Dani just bought a 500GB drive for under $100. Um, yeah.

When I bought my current computer (a couple years ago), I was sure that 6 USB ports would be enough for anyone. Yeah, right. Ok, I'll buy a hub. :-) Ok, I don't need all of them all of the time, but it's just easier to leave things like the iPod cable plugged in all the time.

(In a similar vein, I was looking at the mass of plugs in my office -- four-outlet wall socket and 6-outlet UPS, all full. One of the nine plugs (the UPS is plugged into the wall) turned out to be spurious. Eek. (CPU, monitor, printer, scanner, two hard drives, router, lamp. Clearly the lamp's days are numbered.))


Conversation while driving through a construction zone:

"Is this our on-ramp?"
"I think so. At least the signs are facing the right way."
"And no oncoming headlights. Let's go for it."
"Man, if their attitude is 'if you're not from around here why are you on our roads?', they should make it easier to flee."


My father-in-law and his wife were in town Thursday (on their way south for the winter), so dinner with them trumped this week's Hebrew class. They were staying at a hotel along I-79 (Stubenville Pike) and said they wanted to eat at "that Italian restaurant". We don't have much occasion to be on 79 between 279 and 279; can they be more specific? The one where they put the french fries on the sandwiches. Ok, "Primanti's" is an Italian name, I suppose, but I've never thought of it as an Italian restaurant. :-) (Food was ok, smoke was pretty bad, vegetarian options were limited. Next time I push for something different.)


A picture in today's paper made me laugh. It was of two people in a Christmas-tree lot with their dogs. I laughed because I had two conflicting thoughts: we're identifying the tree the dogs like (in that way that only dogs do) and keeping it far far away from the living room, versus we're letting the dogs pick the tree since it's going to be theirs anyway. :-)


This morning's torah reader wanted to give hagbahah (one of the honors) to a woman because we tend to give it to men. This involves lifting the open torah scroll overhead and turning so everyone can see it. The first few people he asked turned him down, so I said I would do it. I commented that early in the year is great for lefties because of where the weight is. Only after I said it did I realize that I'm not actually a lefty; I just feel like one. (Born lefty, raised righty.) Eventually I'm probably going to confuse someone with this. :-)


Browser-tab cleanup time!

What if Gmail had been designed by Microsoft? (source lost, sorry)

The clock at the center of the world, reported by [livejournal.com profile] siderea.

ZIP Skinny looks up census data by ZIP code and lets you compare areas side by side.

The care and feeding of volunteers, written in the context of the synagogue but applicable more broadly. There's not a lot here that's new to me, but it's a good starting point when thinking about why people do what they do.

Rohrschach passwords? This is an interesting idea (though not ready for prime time yet) IFF any individual is consistent enough to see the same images in a given inkblot over time. Is that the case? Or might I see a butterfly today and, six months from now, not only be convinced that it's a flower but be unable to remember that I once saw a butterfly?

The secret to raising smart kids (from [livejournal.com profile] ralphmelton). I haven't read it all yet, but I don't want to lose it and some of you might be interested too.

Zamzar claims to be able to capture "non-downloadable" content (like YouTube) and convert to various formats. I haven't given it a spin yet. Speaking of tools I haven't tried out yet, Foxit looks to be an alternative to Adobe for reading PDF.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-09 07:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mbarr.livejournal.com
My shul lets women do Hagbah/Gleelah. Only problem is that we couldn't find any women that could actually pick up the torah, as they're pretty heavy. (It's a mostly ortho shul, so this isn't a normal thing...)

I think they've found 1 or 2 women that can, but they aren't real confident in it.. and don't want to drop it


At this point... we just have women do gleelah :)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-10 02:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mbarr.livejournal.com
come to my shul :) we don't light candles in shul, but women will do kiddush normally for dinner-

Just 'cause.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-09 08:13 am (UTC)
siderea: (Default)
From: [personal profile] siderea
Zweck makes my teeth grind. She's correct about what is bad and incorrect about what is good. Very long story short, you probably shouldn't be saying shit like, "You must have worked very hard", either. Accomplishments are not an occasion for a referrendum on the accomplisher. If you want to raise an artist who can tell the difference between his self and his art, a scientist who can tell the difference between her self and her research, an executive who can tell the difference between his self and his bank account, then don't interpret every accomplishment your child makes as indicating something about the child. Comment on the work, not the kid: "This is great!" "I really like this." "I particularly liked your choice of ---." "I loved it when you ---." "This is an excellent ---." "I'm very impressed by this." "What a beautiful ---!" "This is quite an accomplishment." "Good job." "Well done." "I'm proud of you." "I'm delighted with ---" "I am in awe of ---" "Nifty solution!" "Fabulous!" "Interesting!" "Groovy!" "Shiney!" "It rocked my socks!"
Edited Date: 2007-12-09 08:13 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-09 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ichur72.livejournal.com
>> The secret to raising smart kids

This is interesting -- thanks for posting it. It makes me glad that one of the phrases my son has started saying is "try again".

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-09 07:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/merle_/
Remember when disk space cost a dollar a meg?

Oh, yeah. I remember playing games that loaded off of cassette tapes. It took just over five minutes to load the 14k chess program.

Speed and space these days are truly incredible. There are Lanman password crackers that work by simply precomputing all possible hashes within a certain set of characters. They take a while to run, and up to about 100G of disk space, but once you have that...

Where to start?

Date: 2007-12-10 06:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byronhaverford.livejournal.com
>Dani just bought a 500GB drive for under $100.

I'm surprised you didn't go for NAS. My 1T box was about $100, IIRC. I've backed up my entire DVD collection. I figured the kids would stream their videos instead of using the physical DVDs, and thus increase the life of the discs (which is a significant consideration when you have three kids of single-digit ages). They continue to use the DVDs. Sigh.

>Primanti's... vegetarian options were limited

Do you accept fish in that situation?

>hagbahah [is] more about balance than strength

I dunno. I find that task to be challenging, and I do not consider myself to be a physically weak man. I suspect that there is some secret that I have not yet figured out, and I'm trying to brute-force it. I keep worrying that the two halves will drift apart, and I will be responsible for tearing a torah.

Re: Where to start?

Date: 2007-12-11 02:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byronhaverford.livejournal.com
I didn't mean $/GB, I meant shared storage space for all computers. Very convenient.

I figure if there's one dish on the menu I can eat, that's a victory. (But you're right -- it's not worth going back.)

I get it -- you're levering off the edge of the table, then raising the scrolls once they're vertical (give or take rotational momentum). You've still got to get it from table-height to overhead; that's what trips me up.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags