election non-surprise
Jan. 30th, 2008 03:33 pm
I'm kind of sad that John Edwards dropped out of the Democratic race.
He wasn't going to win (on first ballot at the convention), I don't
think, but he has enough of a following that it seems like he could
have influenced the front-runners had he stayed in. On the other hand,
he was probably drawing more votes from Obama than from
Hillary ("sleaze as usual"), so if it helps Obama win the nomination
it won't be all bad. He hasn't made a formal endorsement,
but this might count. Still, if the Dems don't slap Hillary
down hard and soon, they risk blowing the election, either by
nominating a slick divisive candidate or by doing too much dirty
campaigning before rejecting her.
(I'm not for Obama, but I'm against Hillary. I really wish we didn't have institutionalized two-party rule in this country; it discourages innovation.)
Did anyone else catch the complaint from the NH chapter of NOW? (It was in the news yesterday or the day before.) They complained that Kennedy "betrayed women" by not endorsing Hillary. Earth to NOW: you are doing harm to your candidate if your entire platform is "she's a she". Not that I mind, but I'm just sayin'.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-31 03:29 pm (UTC)What NOW fails to realize is that many of us would be happy to vote for a woman for President if it's a particular person we respect. If it were Jodi Rell (R-CT) or Kathleen Sibelius (D-KS) or Diane Feinstein (D-CA) I'd be happy to vote for "the woman" But this is Hilary Clinton we're talking about; she wouldn't have the name recognition she had if not for her husband being the President of the United States and, regardless of what you thought of his policies, somewhat of a slimeball.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-01 04:23 am (UTC)I'll probably register for the Democratic race unless something surprising happens before I have to decide. "Surprising" would be on the scale of Huckabee making a big come-back. (I think he's the only candidate who scares me more than Hillary, though many displease me.)