random bits from the news
Via Slashdot: daylight "saving" time actually increases energy usage. ("Saving" is a misnomer; we should call it "daylight shifting time", which is all it accomplishes. There are not, after all, storehouses in which we collect excess sunlight for use during lean times; nothing is saved.) The researchers were handed a great data-collection opportunity: they did their work in Indiana, where until recently some counties did DST and others did not. So they not only had before-and-after data, but also a control group nearby to factor out weather and the like.
A few days ago a house in Plum (near Pittsburgh) exploded, apparently from a gas leak. (I actually saw this on national news before I saw the local news.) This made me wonder whether it's possible to build a detector (other than the human nose) for household use. We have smoke detectors and carbon-monoxide detectors; why have I never heard of a gas-buildup detector? Granted that such incidents are extremely rare, but they are potentially much more devastating than fires and CO buildup, so if an inexpensive household gadget could provide some potential warning, that'd be great.
In lighter news:
You know that "who do you want to answer the phone at 3AM?" ad the Clinton
campaign is running? The little girl in the ad was stock footage; she's now an adult and working on the Obama campaign (via
insomnia).
Headline of the day, from
thnidu: Skywalkers in Korea Cross Han Solo.

no subject
DST is disruptive, has no economic benefits (today), and has only marginal social benefits (most people do not spend the time after dinner doing stuff outdoors). I would prefer that we pick one time standard and just stick with it. The reduction in IT costs and medical errors alone would probably be worth it.
no subject
We had to put a lot of effort into fixing things when the DST boundaries shifted last year, because hardcoded things were hidden deep within the codebase. Which is bad, but then again, arbitrary time shifts are just as bad...