random bits from the news
Via Slashdot: daylight "saving" time actually increases energy usage. ("Saving" is a misnomer; we should call it "daylight shifting time", which is all it accomplishes. There are not, after all, storehouses in which we collect excess sunlight for use during lean times; nothing is saved.) The researchers were handed a great data-collection opportunity: they did their work in Indiana, where until recently some counties did DST and others did not. So they not only had before-and-after data, but also a control group nearby to factor out weather and the like.
A few days ago a house in Plum (near Pittsburgh) exploded, apparently from a gas leak. (I actually saw this on national news before I saw the local news.) This made me wonder whether it's possible to build a detector (other than the human nose) for household use. We have smoke detectors and carbon-monoxide detectors; why have I never heard of a gas-buildup detector? Granted that such incidents are extremely rare, but they are potentially much more devastating than fires and CO buildup, so if an inexpensive household gadget could provide some potential warning, that'd be great.
In lighter news:
You know that "who do you want to answer the phone at 3AM?" ad the Clinton
campaign is running? The little girl in the ad was stock footage; she's now an adult and working on the Obama campaign (via
insomnia).
Headline of the day, from
thnidu: Skywalkers in Korea Cross Han Solo.
no subject
Notice the complete lack of research substantiation in that article. I'm given to understand the hygene theory is one with lots of "face validity", and it widely accepted as reasonable, but for which nobody's really managed to come up with substantiating evidence... and, most damning, it doesn't fit the epidemiological evidence.
Unless there's some reason inner-city African-American kids are being raised in ultra-sanitary environments much, much more often than their European-American peers in the 'burbs.
no subject
Interesting. I didn't know that that population had disproportionate allergies/asthma/etc.
no subject
Haven't yet found urban/rural data.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
How much trouble is it for you to get a copy of this article? I assume you have free access?
no subject
no subject
Allergy evidence
Exactly how this fits in, no one is sure, since autoimmune syndromes seem to be related to chimerism and mosaicism (the former where two non-identical embryos merge, partially merge, exchange cells by a merged placenta, or the embryo swaps cells with the mother -- embryonic brain cells wind up in the mother, and seem to be related to a decrease in brain deterioration, but may be linked to other problems, the latter caused by dropped chromosomes or portions of chromosomes or excess duplication of chromosomes during development). It may be that your body normally would tolerate the alien cells (alien being a difficult concept to define). To give you an idea of the extent, approximately 70% of people are thought to be either chimeric or severely mosaic; moderate mosaicism may actually approach 100%, and that's not including cancer under the mosaic label.
The evidence is pretty clear on the parasites. One research team is actually looking into breeding a parasite that can be kept in check and would help remove cholesterol from the gut.
One known weight loss technique involves ingesting tape worms and then closely monitoring the patient, killing the tapeworms when either they get too aggressive or the patient reaches a desired weight. Some herbal weight loss supplements contain tapeworm eggs, and tapeworm eggs can be purchased for weight loss without a doctor's supervision, but that's not a bright idea.
The question is what effect killing bacteria and viruses has on humans. There are more bacterial cells in your body than there are human cells. The bacterial cells are smaller.... It's unlikely that allergies are caused by a lack of bacteria -- bacteria are tackled by a different segment of the immune system. It's pretty unlikely that bacteria can mutate to avoid antibacterial soaps -- and most soaps themselves do a good job of killing bacteria.
The main problem thought to come from killing bacteria and viruses in the environment is that our immune systems get lazy. Going back to the cowpox vaccine, it's been known that vaccines sometimes cause tumor destruction. If you get an otherwise untreatble cancer, and it's not otherwise contraindicated, getting every possible vaccination over a period of time isn't a bad strategy. Even if it works by placebo, hey, it works!
Children that don't receive vaccinations but live in an area where most children do get vaccinations sometimes get hit especially hard when they experience the disease later in life than would have been normal.
Basic hygiene has saved more lives than all other medical interventions combined. The question is whether we're going overboard.
And by the way, the epidemiological evidence does support the allergy/autoimmune/parasite link, and it also supports the bacteria/virus/cancer link as well as the bacteria/vaccination problem.
Inner city kids in the United States don't tend to get exposed to intestinal parasites. Go some place where everyone has intestinal parasites, and you find there aren't nearly as many allergies.