PA primary, and a question for Bostonians
Some folks have been claiming that the media are biased against Clinton. I don't see it, really; there's plenty of bias against Obama too. Who actually believes that "the media" speak with one voice? It's important to use multiple news sources precisely because they don't. But for those who claim an anti-Clinton bias, what's with reporting this as a win by 10%? At best you can round (legitimately) to 9. (While I was writing this the site updated, now reporting 54.6 to 45.4. That's still not 10% unless you do your math by rounding one number and then substracting from 100 to get the other. I could see some sloppy reporters doing that, but those weren't the published numbers this morning when I saw 10% headlines.)
In unrelated news... friends in Boston, is
this
report
accurate? (Link from Metahacker on LJ.)
Legislation is pending to restrict public movement of people
suspected of being gang members -- sponsored by
Democrats? WTF? That seems really out of character for
most Democrats at all, let alone New England Democrats. Or is this
some sort of trick where you introduce a bill you know can't pass to
get some of your constituents off your back, while hoping other people
see what you're doing and don't hold it against you?
no subject
no subject
Keep in mind, it was made by a Hillary fan, so the second half is a lot of Clinton propaganda set to a good song. :) But the first half is a good sampling of some of the crap she's gotten from the main stream media.