![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
random bits
This weekend Dani and I joined some friends for a last-minute gaming get-together. We played La Cita (my third time, I think), which split interestingly: the winner had 35 points (would have been 40 if he hadn't starved his people in the last round), another player and I had 32 and 33, and the other two were in the high teens. It didn't look like that in play. (I thought I was doing worse and those last two better.) Then we played Rum and Pirates and all clumped within a few points of each other (something like 62-70). I like both of these games and will happily play more.
A few weeks ago I ordered a used DVD set via Amazon Marketplace. (I decided to see what all the Heroes fuss is about.) I chose a seller who had only a handful of ratings, all positive, figuring that someone like that is motivated to give good service. (Also, I noticed that the DVD would ship from PA.) A few weeks passed with no DVDs, so I sent email a couple days ago. This morning the seller wrote back with profuse apologies; he (she?) had accidentally sent my order to someone else who'd ordered on the same day, but now had the set back in hand -- "so I'll drive it over this afternoon". It turns out the seller is in the greater-Pittsburgh area. As promised, the DVDs were waiting for me when I got home from work, so everything worked out just fine. (I never order anything from third-party sellers that I actually need in a hurry.)
Speaking of TV,
the BBC
might bring back Blake's 7 (link from ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
caryabend).
Woo hoo! I trust that this will eventually find its way to DVD and,
thence, my TV. Since it's been more than a quarter-century, I do
wonder what they'll do for casting. Of course, they could well do a
"25 years later..." story, even though the final season left things
on a cliffhanger.
(Anonymous) quote of the day, after interviewing a job candidate: "He has a lot of learning to do, and I don't want to pay the tuition".
This sign in a shop made me laugh.
Reusable printer paper looks like an interesting idea; I wonder if it can be developed economically. I'm surprised by the claims about what it costs to (1) manufacture and (2) recycle a piece of paper.
Quote of the
day #2 brings some much-needed context to the flap over Obama's
ex-minister. Excerpt (compiled by dglenn):
"No one likes to hear someone, especially a preacher, criticize our
good country. But Donna Potis [...] and so many others who decry
presidential candidate Barack Obama for having attended the
Rev. Jeremiah Wright's church while he preached prophetically
have very selective memories." The whole thing is worth a read;
it's not long.
Somewhat relatedly, osewalrus pointed me to
this
post pointing out that all the candidates and the voters
have a bigger religious-leader problem than this. Excerpt:
"[I]f I wake up and find that I'm in an America where certain pastors
and certain churches are openly denounced from the White House's
presidential podium, I will suddenly get even more nervous about
freedom of religion in America than I already am." Yes.
I found this
speculative, alternate timeline of the last ten years
by rjlippincott interesting.
Question for my Jewish (and Jewish-aware) readers: Thursday is Yom HaShoah (Holocaust rememberance day), so instead of my usual "daf bit" in the morning service, I'd like to do something on-theme. It has to be a teaching, something that would qualify as torah study, which rules out most of the readings that tend to show up in special services for the day. Any suggestions? I could probably find something in Lamentations, if that's not cliche, but I'm not really sure. And naturally, I do not wish to offend with a bad choice people who are old enough to remember.
no subject
4) And now the big one....
I think it's acceptable for people, wing-nuts included, to hold whatever opinions they want and to preach them to people who want to listen. This is not to say that I agree with those opinions. Your characterization is better: it's not about acceptability but relevance. I think it's acceptable for Obama's (or Clinton's or McCain's) preacher to hold unpopular opinions -- and unacceptable for that to affect the candidates.
I think it is completely fair to hold candidates accountable for what members of their staff say and do on their behalf; that's why you have campaign staffs, to represent you. But I don't think anybody's preacher, college roommate, next-door neighbor, ex-spouse, or boss is in such a role.
no subject