Entry tags:
chutzpah or cluelessness?
An open letter to the Pittsburgh UJF:
When you called me a few weeks ago looking for money, I told you that: (1) I do not approve of telephone solicitations so put me on your do-not-call list, and (2) I would consider a written request along with all my other requests for charitable donations. I would have just told you to go away, but -- even though, like the United Way, you impose an overhead surcharge -- you do help some worthy local organizations that I don't already support directly. So I'm willing to consider a donation, but on my terms, not yours.
Sending me a letter thanking me for my pledge of $X was not the correct next move on your part.
Now that I think about it, you did the same thing last year. I called you and you apologized, saying it would not happen again. I eventually made a small donation. $X, in fact.
This year I'm not buying that explanation. If you had requested my help in an appropriate way I would have given, and probably more than $X. But you didn't ask; you presumed. Later this year you will send me a "bill" for a pledge I never made. Unless you convince me that you have taken corrective action, I won't be sending you anything this year other than this letter. And if you do convince me but your phone-spammers call next year, we're done forever.
You might decide that my donation is too small to be worth the effort of setting this right. That's fine too. If I don't hear from you, I'll assume that's what happened.
I've also posted this letter to my blog. If there's any followup, I'll share that with my readers too. I'm not unfair, just unimpressed.
Edit 2-12 21:30: Today I came home to a polite message on the answering machine from the campaign manager, along with email saying she would like to speak with me. It was too late to catch her today, but I will call tomorrow morning.
Edit 2-13 17:15: I spoke with the campaign manager today. She is very apologetic, said she would put me on the do-not-call list, and offered to just send me a letter once a year and otherwise not bother me, which is perfect. She also wants to meet me for coffee (or equivalent in my case), even after I pointed out that I'm not one of their big-time donors.
When you called me a few weeks ago looking for money, I told you that: (1) I do not approve of telephone solicitations so put me on your do-not-call list, and (2) I would consider a written request along with all my other requests for charitable donations. I would have just told you to go away, but -- even though, like the United Way, you impose an overhead surcharge -- you do help some worthy local organizations that I don't already support directly. So I'm willing to consider a donation, but on my terms, not yours.
Sending me a letter thanking me for my pledge of $X was not the correct next move on your part.
Now that I think about it, you did the same thing last year. I called you and you apologized, saying it would not happen again. I eventually made a small donation. $X, in fact.
This year I'm not buying that explanation. If you had requested my help in an appropriate way I would have given, and probably more than $X. But you didn't ask; you presumed. Later this year you will send me a "bill" for a pledge I never made. Unless you convince me that you have taken corrective action, I won't be sending you anything this year other than this letter. And if you do convince me but your phone-spammers call next year, we're done forever.
You might decide that my donation is too small to be worth the effort of setting this right. That's fine too. If I don't hear from you, I'll assume that's what happened.
I've also posted this letter to my blog. If there's any followup, I'll share that with my readers too. I'm not unfair, just unimpressed.
Edit 2-12 21:30: Today I came home to a polite message on the answering machine from the campaign manager, along with email saying she would like to speak with me. It was too late to catch her today, but I will call tomorrow morning.
Edit 2-13 17:15: I spoke with the campaign manager today. She is very apologetic, said she would put me on the do-not-call list, and offered to just send me a letter once a year and otherwise not bother me, which is perfect. She also wants to meet me for coffee (or equivalent in my case), even after I pointed out that I'm not one of their big-time donors.

no subject
I'd rather give my money to Kiva. Feh. At least they don't hit me up like I'm an endless bucket.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
But complaints are usually met with the explanation that 'we know it alienates some people, but it brings in more than it loses.' So that's all right, then...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I also dislike it when the police department calls for a donation, and explicitly says they're driving by the house to pick it up. There a subtle threat here ("we know where you live"), and it's just too close to extortion.
And number 3: I hate pledge drives on NPR. I make a point of NEVER renewing my membership at a time when it might be mistaken for a pledge drive contribution. (Ideally, I shoot for halfway between drives.) Why would I send them money when they are doing the thing I hate most? That's really rewarding bad behavior.
(no subject)
no subject
*Amusingly, this "repeat as necessary" tactic is the same one that I used with teenagers when I worked at a high school.
(no subject)