Entry tags:
an open letter to Habitat for Humanity
Dear Habitat for Humanity,
I helped you build a house once, and later gave you money. You spent far in excess of that donation sending me solicitations, making me less inclined to send you more. (I know other charities that use their money more wisely.) Then you started sending me spam and ignored cease-and-desist notices. I used your next postage-paid envelope to send a final cease-and-desist on the spam thing, and that didn't work either. You went onto my "do not donate, ever" list.
And today you called and were irritated that I considered this a problem. The proper response to "your policies have led me to re-evaluate and I do not want to hear from you" is not "but we do all this good work!" but, rather, "I'm sorry" followed by either "I'll take you off all our lists" or "how can we make things right?". I have now directed you not to call me and I'm sure it's been 18 months since I sent you any money (which is the timeout on the do-not-call law). If you call me again I will invoke the attorney general. If you want to set matters right, you must send me a physical letter (not email, not a phone call) actually addressing my complaints. Have a nice day.
I helped you build a house once, and later gave you money. You spent far in excess of that donation sending me solicitations, making me less inclined to send you more. (I know other charities that use their money more wisely.) Then you started sending me spam and ignored cease-and-desist notices. I used your next postage-paid envelope to send a final cease-and-desist on the spam thing, and that didn't work either. You went onto my "do not donate, ever" list.
And today you called and were irritated that I considered this a problem. The proper response to "your policies have led me to re-evaluate and I do not want to hear from you" is not "but we do all this good work!" but, rather, "I'm sorry" followed by either "I'll take you off all our lists" or "how can we make things right?". I have now directed you not to call me and I'm sure it's been 18 months since I sent you any money (which is the timeout on the do-not-call law). If you call me again I will invoke the attorney general. If you want to set matters right, you must send me a physical letter (not email, not a phone call) actually addressing my complaints. Have a nice day.

no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I've had this problem with a lot of charities (and just about every PBS station.. really, $15 did not pay for ten years of weekly mailings!). It is hard to believe that they cannot get the message that they are wasting so much money.
This year (well, 2009, I guess) I took the approach of giving no money to anyone. If they have not sent more than three letters begging by the end of this month I'm doubling what I sent them in 2008. It seems like a fair policy, and makes up for last year. (if they did send more letters.. well, it depends on how often and how much I'd sent them, because a few $hundred can pay for a lot of envelopes with quite a bit left over)
(no subject)
no subject
In general, I've shifted my charity strategy to give more money to fewer organizations over the years. It seems that the number of solicitations has often been inversely related to the size of the donation, which makes the offenders all the more offensive.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
It's Penn Environment I can't get to stop sending me physical mail. *rolls eyes*
(no subject)
no subject
Now I am very targeted and work w/the donations coordinator of smaller (<$3 mil budget) organizations and make sure the money goes to a specific purpose (e.g. "paying lawyers on project") and that no mailings will result.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)