Dear LJ Brain Trust,
We recently received a Keurig coffee maker as a gift. This is one of those gizmos that takes individual packets for making coffee (or tea or cocoa). Pour in water, put in individual packet, push the button, and out comes a cup of hot drink a couple minutes later. As the pitch goes, if you and your spouse like very different things, this gadget's for you.
To my surprise, I have found a coffee-based drink that was actually pleasant. This is a first, so I turn to you, o brain trust, to guide my further explorations. Because while this was fine, it isn't exactly healthy. Also, I'd kind of like to know about non-dairy options (for meat meals), assuming any exist that I'd like. For this experiment I started with Dani's mantra that coffee is a good source of calcium.
What worked: a French vanilla packet turned into 8oz of coffee (the gadget supports 6-10), about 4oz (!) of half-and-half (didn't have cream in the house), and about two heapingtableteaspoons of sugar (ack). These were added incrementally, alternating half-and-half and sugar in small quantities until it tasted good. So possibly a better answer is more milk product/no sugar, and I don't know how cream versus half-and-half will play out. There is also the question of other coffee bases to try, particularly if I can find them in variety packs or something so I'm not committing to a whole box of something we turn out not to like. I am categorically uninterested in decaffeinated coffees (defeats the purpose of coffee for me).
For calibration, I also like most black teas. For a "regular" tea I default to English breakfast. I do not care for Early Grey but Lady Grey is ok. I like most strongly-flavored or spiced teas, so my instinct is to look for coffees with some flavor additive. (This is why I gravitated to the French vanilla, and I have my eye on the hazelnut packet.) I think what this all means is that I don't like bitter flavors. What does that imply about coffee roast types? I see a variety of descriptors in that space but I don't know what they tend to mean for flavor. And how should I be thinking about the trade-off between stronger coffee flavors and brew strength?
We recently received a Keurig coffee maker as a gift. This is one of those gizmos that takes individual packets for making coffee (or tea or cocoa). Pour in water, put in individual packet, push the button, and out comes a cup of hot drink a couple minutes later. As the pitch goes, if you and your spouse like very different things, this gadget's for you.
To my surprise, I have found a coffee-based drink that was actually pleasant. This is a first, so I turn to you, o brain trust, to guide my further explorations. Because while this was fine, it isn't exactly healthy. Also, I'd kind of like to know about non-dairy options (for meat meals), assuming any exist that I'd like. For this experiment I started with Dani's mantra that coffee is a good source of calcium.
What worked: a French vanilla packet turned into 8oz of coffee (the gadget supports 6-10), about 4oz (!) of half-and-half (didn't have cream in the house), and about two heaping
For calibration, I also like most black teas. For a "regular" tea I default to English breakfast. I do not care for Early Grey but Lady Grey is ok. I like most strongly-flavored or spiced teas, so my instinct is to look for coffees with some flavor additive. (This is why I gravitated to the French vanilla, and I have my eye on the hazelnut packet.) I think what this all means is that I don't like bitter flavors. What does that imply about coffee roast types? I see a variety of descriptors in that space but I don't know what they tend to mean for flavor. And how should I be thinking about the trade-off between stronger coffee flavors and brew strength?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 07:08 pm (UTC)Not overcooking it is important too. When you hear the last gurgle from the machine, turn the burner off. The longer it sits on the hot burner the more bitter and burnt it gets.
I tend towards non-packet systems. It's convenient, but you have little control over the brewing, or over the varieties of coffee. For the absolute control-freak you want to boil your water separately to a particular temperature and use something like a French press, but I'm okay with a standard cheap drip coffee maker.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 09:11 pm (UTC)I've only just had the first cup of coffee I didn't think was foul; I'm a long way from being a control freak. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-28 02:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-28 08:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-29 02:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-29 04:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-29 04:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 07:08 pm (UTC)S
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 09:12 pm (UTC)They also do hot cocoa, which I will explore at some point. I tend to make it rarely and with milk, but this could still be handy sometimes.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 07:25 pm (UTC)The fact is, most flavored coffees have the cheapest, nastiest artificial flavors sprayed on them, and because these beans are destined for such chemical crap, they use the lowest quality beans.
Whereas if you start out with a nice cup of a decent, low acid, light roasted bean, you can add one of:
- a drop of real vanilla, or a sprinkling of ground vanilla bean pod
- a tablespoon of liqueur
- a glug of a flavored syrup
to add the flavor you feel like.
Beans that fit this profile:
Brazilian Santos
El Salvador Cerros Las Ranas (Lake of Frogs)
Ethiopian Yirgacheffe
Panama Boquete
Sumatra Mandheling
These are all typically light-roasted, with low to moderate acidity levels.
Another thing you can try to get low acid extraction is cold brewing coffee.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 08:04 pm (UTC)Ya, this. I can't stand flavored coffee, even though I love flavors in my coffee.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 09:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 11:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-28 12:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-29 03:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-28 09:22 am (UTC)If you like the vanilla flavour, you could try using vanilla sugar (keep a vanilla pod in your sugar jar) - ah, but is the high sugar content one of the things you're trying to finesse. There are parts of the world where cardamom is a traditional flavouring (bash a cardamom pod to release the seeds, throw the whole thing into your cup, don't try to swallow it) and might work for you...
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-29 03:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-01 03:34 am (UTC)You definitely want to use a good quality vanilla bean (I had some on hand from Penzey's). Dried out vanilla beans are no fun to work with :)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-01 04:49 am (UTC)Not helping here
Date: 2010-06-27 07:39 pm (UTC)That's what my jarl calls "candy bar coffee." ;-D
Re: Not helping here
Date: 2010-06-27 09:20 pm (UTC)But oops, typo! Two heaping teaspoons! Very different. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 08:27 pm (UTC)I looked through their offerings. Most of what I could identify as what I'm guessing you would like (your tastes sound similar to mine for coffee) are labeled as Breakfast Blend, so that would give you one place to start.
People who add a lot of additives can get away with less additives by using a light roast since it's milder. Folks who don't add much are generally trying to get the STRONG coffee taste, and that's when they want a dark roast.
As far as the specific additives, I'm not sure how you feel about artificial sweeteners. My standard coffee flavoring is a Splenda sweetened Torani almond syrup (http://www.torani.com/products/sugar-free-almond-syrup). They have a huge range of flavors (both in real sugar and splenda versions). I'm not sure what vendors are available to you (and shipping the bottles is prohibitive), but I buy mine at World Market.
As far as non-dairy options, I know the vegans on the tea boards I frequent use a variety of milk-substitutes (almond milk, soy milk, etc). You're probably more familiar with them than I am. I imagine that they would work for coffee. Coconut milk may be especially interesting for flavor. (mmm, now I'm going to have to try that!)
As a random data point, I also like dumping a half a packet of hot chocolate into my coffee, but that's not particularly helpful on the "make it more healthy" quest! :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 11:45 pm (UTC)Yup.
Thanks for the tips! I didn't think to try Splenda but will next time.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 09:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 11:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 10:39 pm (UTC)The grocery store sells fat-free half and half that I enjoy quite a bit and is healthier for you than the regular stuff, but I don't think it has fewer calories. Personally I don't think coffee adds much to your caloric intake -- I think what you're describing is about 50 calories, and with the caffeine you won't want more than 2-3 a day. 2 tsp of sugar isn't bad; you can probably make it with less if you make a smaller beverage (ie. 4 oz coffee/2 oz milk). Sugar in the raw works best. You'll want to put in the sugar first so that it distributes evenly before you cool it with the cream.
For non-dairy, there's Rich's creamer, no doubt familiar to you from shul: http://www.allinkosher.com/p-43563-richs-coffee-rich-non-dairy-creamer-16-oz-parve.aspx -- I guess it's fine.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-27 11:50 pm (UTC)and with the caffeine you won't want more than 2-3 a day
I'm not so sure about that. :-) But really, I'm unlikely to make that much a day, and I already know that there's nothing I can do to the stuff that comes out of the coffee-maker at work to make it palatable.
Thanks for the creamer tip. I don't actually know what they use at shul; I've never gone over to the coffee table to look.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-28 02:33 am (UTC)I bought a big box of Land o'Lakes MiniMoos, which are shelf-stable half and half creamer cups, so I don't have to worry about keeping cream in the house.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-29 03:05 am (UTC)There's actual cream in the MiniMoos? I wonder how they make that shelf-stable.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-29 02:53 pm (UTC)Of course, like anything, the expiration is pretty conservative, so who knows what the actual shelf stable life is.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-28 03:27 am (UTC)NOOOOOOO!! SAVE YOURSELF NOW!!!
What worked: a French vanilla packet turned into 8oz of coffee (the gadget supports 6-10), about 4oz (!) of half-and-half (didn't have cream in the house), and about two heaping teaspoons of sugar (ack). These were added incrementally, alternating half-and-half and sugar in small quantities until it tasted good. So possibly a better answer is more milk product/no sugar, and I don't know how cream versus half-and-half will play out.
Or at that point you could try leaving the coffee out. :}
I think what this all means is that I don't like bitter flavors.
OK, so you need to know that "dark roast" and "french roast" and "italian roast" mean "paint strippers", and should be avoided like the plague. Should you be inclined to non-gadgeted coffee, I highly recommend Equal Exchange brand "Organic Breakfast Blend" (and possibly "Organic Breakfast Blend Dark" which I seem to recall isn't much of a dark roast).
Also, if you have occasion to try cold-water process brewed coffee, do. It's a process of preparing coffee which leaves almost no bitterness; it's quite scrumptious.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-29 03:11 am (UTC)True, but then I'd lose the caffeine. :-) (Seriously, if I can replace some of the artificial sweeteners delivered via Diet Coke et al with other palatable caffeine sources, without the caloric costs of regular Coke et al, that's useful data to have.)
Thanks for the info about paint strippers. I didn't know anything about various international trends until now. Good to know.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-29 04:43 am (UTC)Drop a Penguin Mint in there. Or use Water Joe.