cellio: (out-of-mind)
Monica ([personal profile] cellio) wrote2010-07-11 09:46 pm
Entry tags:

yes we talk like this

At the Giant Eagle pharmacy:

Me: Here's a prescription, and a gift card from Big Pharma that will pay for three months' worth. If I mail-order it I can get three months' worth at once; can you do that for me?

Her: I don't know; I'm just the front-desk flunky. Do you want to leave it and we'll give you as much as we're allowed to?

Me: Sure.

After I did my grocery shopping I returned.

Her: Sorry, we're only allowed to do one fill-up at a time.

Me: I understand. Have we completed this transaction, then?

Her: Um, yes?

Me: Will you take as given that I walked out through that exit and then came back in, or do I need to actually do it?

Her: Nice try, but you have to wait a month.

Oh well. I have until the end of the year to use the gift card.




Dani: So you can read on Shabbat; can you use a Kindle?

Me: No, because you have to manipulate the controls. It's like changing the channels on TV; technically you can watch it if it's on but you can't change the channel or volume. (Pause.) I suppose if, before Shabbat, you set in motion a smooth scroll at a readable pace, that would be like programming the lights. But it seems unworkable.

Dani: What about software that tracks your eye movements and turns the page at the right time?

Me: Seems like manipulation to me. Next you'll be bringing up sentient lightbulbs again.

Dani: How good does the programming have to be before your software qualifies as a servant?

I have no answer to that. Halacha geeks?
ext_87516: (torah)

[identity profile] 530nm330hz.livejournal.com 2010-07-12 02:40 am (UTC)(link)
It's not at all clear to me that an e-book reader should be asur on Shabbat. I don't think the display qualifies as ktivah, I don't think manipulating the controls is boneh nor makeh bepatish (if they use capacitive switches rather than physical complete-the-circuit switches), and the display isn't incandescing nor is the battery relying on combustion, so there's no be'irah.

Culturally, we've become averse to manipulating anything electronic on Shabbat, but I doubt that this will remain an absolute over the next half-century.

[identity profile] metahacker.livejournal.com 2010-07-12 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
Out of curiosity: would a wind-up Victrola (mechanical reproduction of sound, needle-to-horn) be asur? Presuming one winds it before the sun sets, and have some sort of timing mechanism to start it up.

what is "work", anyway?

[identity profile] brokengoose.livejournal.com 2010-07-12 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)
(Keeping in mind that I'm not Jewish...)

I'm assuming that there's some sort of "turning pages isn't work" or "turning pages is work, but study is such a worthwhile goal that it doesn't count" rule.

The capacitive versus complete-the-circuit argument is interesting to me.

Pressing the button a Kindle or other e-reader might well involve less physical effort than turning a page. I'd assume that a Kindle would be more in keeping with the "no work" mitzvah than physically turning the pages of a book.

Has anyone considered a mechanical page-turner that turns book pages with the press of a button? That seems like a similar problem that might have already been debated.

Re: what is "work", anyway?

[identity profile] magid.livejournal.com 2010-07-12 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Physical work and halachic (Jewish law) work are related, yet different, concepts. Turning the page of a paper book is not work, because it does not fall into any of the 39 categories of work. Using electricity is a more gray area, because when electricity began to be used, the rabbis of the time put it in the category of lighting or extinguishing a fire (both of which are forbidden) when one completes a circuit.