unplanned-for obsolescence (sic)
I wonder how often the producers of such things take into account that such support will someday end -- there will be no more updates to this OS, for instance, so why bother continuing to check? This thought was brought to mind by my series-1 TiVo, which occasionally hangs and requires a hard reboot via the power cord. Today after reboot I was greeted by the message that the device would be unable to serve my needs until it phoned home, which it wants to do once a day and which it assures me it needs to do for software updates and the program guide. So I had to let it.
There have been no updates to the software for years and the program guide would not be helpful to this box in these modern DTV days. (The box doesn't contain a digital tuner.) There is nothing they could possibly be sending to my TiVo via the internet that could make my box perform any better than it does today. And yet, because a periodic check was programmed in without apparent consideration for expiration conditions or even support for a "stop calling" message from the server, my box needs to go through the motions.
(Yes, all it can do is record manually from channel 3, and I have to control what channel 3 points to externally. For as little current TV as I watch this is just fine and it's not worth spending the money on a new TiVo with new contract.)
Hmm. I just realized that this means that if TiVo should ever decide to, they could disable older boxes remotely -- even ones for which a lifetime contract was purchased (like mine) -- just by not answering that phone call. In other words, TiVo was in the "you're really just renting content" business years before some of the other players. They might not have intended to be in that business, but by programming their devices to require a useless service call, they have built in a weakness that they could later decide to exploit. I wonder what it would take to hack around this.

no subject
Based on what my husband the sysadmin says, I think they take it into account much more frequently than the users do. One of his work tasks is reminding people/divisions/offices exactly how long they have before their software/hardware is no longer supported -- and then a) installing the new stuff when the support is no longer available or b) finding ways to deal with it when a subset of said people/divisions/offices refuse to use the new stuff. Most of those involved go with option a), which means regular purchases of new versions of (almost) the same old stuff.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(There have only been two instances where hard drives have failed catastrophically in my house, and in both of those cases I think the cause was environmental rather than age: once because of flying metal dust when our old furnace was taken out, and once because I tried to run a full backup over a few days when the temperature in the room was over 90°F.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I figure the lifetime subscription was worth it. The payoff was two years and I've had it for at least four. The idea that they can do whatever they want to disable your box is scary but it was a risk that worked out for me. (my series 2 can't talk to my cable box so I'm ditching cable really soon (if I get my act together), making the TiVo useless)
I also did a lifetime subscription to 2600 back in.. wow, about 12 years ago? It had a payoff of four years, but the magazines keep rolling in. I am very un-upset.
My personal opinion is that streaming will take over in the next few years. There are just too many options out there. That still leaves you at the behest of your OS or source but competition will win out.