Entry tags:
an OS question
While waiting for assorted software updates to install today I found myself wondering... Mac OS and Windows usually need to reboot your machine to install updates. Yet I have, several times, seen Unix machines that I believe were being maintained with uptimes of more than a year. What's the deal? Is Unix just better able to support hot-fixes, or are Unix updates that rare? (Or am I wrong about the maintenance of those machines?) And if it's that Unix is better at updating, why does Mac OS, which is Unix-based, need to reboot so often? Mind, it's definitely better in this regard than when I was running Windows; this is a puzzle, not a rant.
Edit: Thanks for the comments thus far. I now understand more about how Unix is put together, and why Windows is different. Still not sure about Mac OS but comments suggest it could be UI-related (that is, the GUI might be more tied into the OS than is the case on Unix).
Edit: Thanks for the comments thus far. I now understand more about how Unix is put together, and why Windows is different. Still not sure about Mac OS but comments suggest it could be UI-related (that is, the GUI might be more tied into the OS than is the case on Unix).

no subject
With Windows, I suspect that certain things are still very closely coupled to the operating system kernel. If I were a little more paranoid/cynical, I might think it is also a sneaky way to mask memory leaks and garbage collection problems.... 8^) To be honest, I do get a lot of Windows "hot-fixes" at work, but I suspect they simply are patches and upgrades to non-core components of the system (or what passses for TSRs these days)
no subject