cellio: (talmud)
Monica ([personal profile] cellio) wrote2010-11-18 09:01 am
Entry tags:

daf bit: Zevachim 8

New tractate, which so far has been all about korbanot (sacrifices) and which ones count for what.

The rabbis taught: the Pesach offering in its season, if slaughtered in its own name (that is, for that specific purpose, after being set aside for that purpose), is a valid offering, but if it was set aside and is then slaughtered for some other reason, it is invalid. During the rest of the year, however, if slaughtered in its name it is invalid, but if slaughtered for another reason it is valid. (8b)

Since a Pesach sacrifice isn't valid at other times of year it makes sense that it would be invalid if so designated, but the talmud here seems to be saying that if you set aside an animal for Pesach and then didn't use it, you can "reuse" it for another purpose if you wait until after Pesach. (That's how I read the footnote in Soncino, anyway.) Normally, as I understand it, if you designate something for a particular (holy) usage you can only use it for that purpose. But the conversation here is kind of confusing and I could be wrong; anyone who can clarify, please do so.

ext_87516: (torah)

[identity profile] 530nm330hz.livejournal.com 2010-11-18 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Near as I can tell (and Soncino is in rare form here), the idea is that we're dealing with a case where the animal was designated as a Korban Pesach and then got lost. Now that the time for offering the Korban Pesach has passed, if the animal is found, what is to be done? It's kodesh, but it can't be offered as a korban pesach.

The way I'm reading this (and Rashi references a more detailed discussion on Pesachim 60b-61a), a korban pesach is considered a subset of shlamim, and so even if it can't be offered as a korban pesach any more, once the window has closed it reverts to being designated for a shlamim in general.

But I could well be wrong.