Harry Potter 7

[cellio]

Spoilers in this post are few and marked; for comments you're on your own.

I had expected a movie this close to the end of the series, and one derived from the final book, to not feel so much like the middle book of a trilogy. I don't know what's coming in the second part, not having read the book, but it felt like the film-makers were just filling time in this movie, same as in the last one. Did the final book need two movies, or is that just the business arm of the franchise speaking? It wasn't a bad movie and it definitely had some nice touches (I've wanted a bag like that for a while; for that I'd actually carry one :-) ), but it felt slow to me for where it was in the series. $5 was a fair price to pay.

I particularly noticed the sound this time -- effective placement, so it sounded like things were coming from the right parts of the room. The visual effects were well-done (not the best we've seen from this series), and I could see some of the places where they were presumably planning 3D enhancements before they ditched 3D. I counted five visual-effects companies in the closing credits, but there was no indication of how the work was divided up. (They all had pretty much the same job descriptions.)

Spoiler warning:

Spoiler comment #1: What do they mean, "three left"? They've gotten two, right? Even if we presume that #7 is V himself, that leaves four others. Did I miss one?

Spoiler comment #2: Hedwig deserved better. That wasn't valiant or glorious or plot-changing; that was just pointless. :-(

Trailers:

• Kung-Fu Panda II: presumably targeted for the kids?
• Yogi Bear: definitely targeted for the kids.
• Voyage of the Dawn-Treader: maybe. I didn't recognize a lot of the trailer from the book; hmm.
• Green Hornet: looks like it could be entertaining if you like that sort of thing, but I'm not sure I do. Netflix, maybe.
• Red Riding Hood: um, what?
• Green Lantern: looks like they're having fun with it, which is promising. Does it at all resemble the comic book, out of curiosity? And did I hear someone in the trailer refer to the job of being a green lantern? He's not a singleton?

Comments

[cellio]

I was wondering. That a book is long doesn't mean it needs to be long. I heard that #5 (I think it was #5) had hundreds of pages of teen angst that didn't seem to add hundreds of pages' worth of content. :-)

[dvarin.livejournal.com]

#4, I think--Goblet of Fire. That one was slooow. And had such fun social disasters as the tri-school dance. And Harry mooning over Cho the entire time.

#3 and #1 are still my favorites, although #5 isn't too bad (until the end--see previous comment). I think that after #3, Rowling became so popular that her editor lost the ability to tell her that she really had better cut down on the drivelling dross.