cellio: (avatar)
Monica ([personal profile] cellio) wrote2011-07-06 10:22 pm
Entry tags:

G+

Someone sent me an invitation to Google+ last Friday, which didn't work after repeated tries. Yesterday two other people sent me invitations, which arrived tonight (so a one-day delay). This time it worked.

First I had to get a newer version of Firefox. I'd been meaning to move from 3.0 to 3.6 but an extension I like wasn't going to be supported, it said. Turns out they built it into the baseline, so all is fine there. (Rendering in 3.6 looks...different. Can't pinpoint it.) Google and Mozilla are both strongly pushing me to move to Firefox 4, but I remember hearing rumblings of problems there, including problems using LJ. If you're using FF4, please comment about any diminished usability you've encountered. For critical functionality -- operating systems, cars, browsers, etc -- I am not an early adopter.

So ok, I have a G+ account. If you're there and care to let me know you exist, please do. If you've figured out useful patterns, please share that. One I figured out right away (so tell me if there's a reason this is wrong): since you can share a post with any number of circles, stay away from any notions of nested circles or hierarchical circles: given the existence of acquaintances, friends, and best-buddies, put somebody in exactly one of those. Of course, there may be orthogonal circles too; that's different. (E.g. I don't currently see the need to have an SCA circle, but if I did it would include some friends, some best-buddies, and some people who aren't in any other circle.)

Yes, I acknowledge the irony of posting on LJ to discuss G+ best practices. :-)

Edited to add: FF 3.6 annoyingly changed how new tabs are placed. New tabs should go to the far right, not immediately after the current tab, thank you very much. This page has some rather colorful language, but it did tell me how to fix it. (I assume I will have to do that with FF4 and 5, too.)

[identity profile] dvarin.livejournal.com 2011-07-07 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
I was unable to use LiveJournal in FF4 and ended up junking it for Safari.
IIRC the problem was something like the text boxes not showing anything you typed in them.

[identity profile] baron-steffan.livejournal.com 2011-07-07 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
Using Firefox 5.0 (yes, that's a five). No problems.

[identity profile] dvarin.livejournal.com 2011-07-07 03:57 am (UTC)(link)
Yup. I didn't revert because the version of FF3 I had _also_ had some issue with... I forget where, but it was situation where neither 3.3 (what I had) nor 4.0 could do what I wanted, and I could not figure out how to get a later version of FF3 off their site--they only let me download FF4.

I'm not sure if you could have both versions active at once without interference. It depends on how they treat the system preferences files. (Preference and other nonstatic info tends to be kept outside the application itself.)

[identity profile] rjmccall.livejournal.com 2011-07-07 06:11 am (UTC)(link)
An application is just a directory with some special metadata.

You can certainly have multiple copies of an application installed in different places or under different names, but yeah, if they store anything in ~/Library/ (which is where most apps put user data), you probably will not have completely independent experiences.

[identity profile] wingblaze.livejournal.com 2011-07-07 12:22 pm (UTC)(link)
What are your thoughts on it so far? I think I mostly like the part where it's not facebook, personally, but haven't tried it. (I'm a google apps customer, and they don't have it ready for us yet.)

[identity profile] alienor.livejournal.com 2011-07-07 12:40 pm (UTC)(link)
When you are eventually (through functionality and support) forced to move to Firefox 5, it looks and behaves so much like Chrome (but less polished) that when reinstalling my desktop software I just went to Chrome (I use Chrome on my netbook because the menus and such take up less room and so it's better for the limited space of a netbook, so I knew what to expect).

I don't know if you've considered Chrome, but since Firefox seems to be headed in that direction, I thought I'd give you a heads up.
littleweeds: (Default)

[personal profile] littleweeds 2011-07-07 01:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm on G+ under my actual name (merging usernames) and I just posted a comment.

[identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com 2011-07-07 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
If you get spare invites, remember me? :-) (Sad eyes)

If I recall, you are using a Mac, yes? Windows FF4 works fine, and it is begging me to upgrade to 5.
gingicat: (Default)

[personal profile] gingicat 2011-07-07 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm there on my gmail address; ping me if you don't have that.

[identity profile] gardenfey.livejournal.com 2011-07-07 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm there as amethystazzz@gmail.com.

[identity profile] eub.livejournal.com 2011-07-08 06:35 am (UTC)(link)
Ironically enough, could you send me an invite to firstinitial.lastname@gmail.com? Thanks. :)

I am using Firefox 4 on Mac because I hadn't heard warning of any problems with LJ... and I haven't seen any yet.
geekosaur: orange tabby with head canted 90 degrees, giving impression of "maybe it'll make more sense if I look at it this way?" (macosx)

[personal profile] geekosaur 2011-07-08 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)
There's also the issue that multiple applications with the same bundle ID (in this case, org.mozilla.firefox) can result in confusion.

[identity profile] gardenfey.livejournal.com 2011-07-08 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I must be sooper-seekrit. :)

[identity profile] nsingman.livejournal.com 2011-07-09 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I only just got there (as Noah Singman), but I'm not sure what to do with it yet. I'm obviously behind enough on LJ as it is.
:-)