Today's daf discusses ritual slaughter gone wrong. The laws of kosher
slaughter are very specific; the animal must be killed in a single cut
across the throat, releasing blood quickly. (This is commonly held to
be more humane than many modern methods of slaughter, by the way. This
urban-dweller can't comment one way or the other.) If the one doing the
slaughter cuts somewhere else first or pauses during the cut, the mishna
on today's daf tells us, the meat is not kosher. Specifically it is
in the class "neveilah", as oppsed to "terefah" ("treif"), but R. Akiva
says it is terefah. R. Yeshabab then gave the following rule, which
R. Akiva ultimately agreed with: if an animal is rendered invalid by
a fault in the slaughter it is neveilah; if it is rendered invalid by
some other defect it is terefah. (32a)
I understand from Judaism.SE
that the difference is: a neveilah is ritually impure (which means if you
touch it you are too), while a terefah isn't. You can derive benefit
(for example, selling the meat to a non-Jew) either way.
But wait, you may be asking: what of the torah's instruction that an
animal torn apart by beasts is terefah, which would seem to qualify as
a fault in how it was killed? (This is the word that is used.)
Google tells me that the Rambam has an answer to that: since that is not
the rabbinic understanding of terefah, this torah passage must mean that
the animal is attacked but left alive -- terefah literally means torn.
So not roadkill but an injury, and you are not allowed to kill and eat
that animal.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-08-08 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)