new LJ style: ow, my eyes!

[cellio]

They changed the style for the individual-entry pages. The big thing everyone is complaining about is the new comment interface; that's butt-ugly too, but my real problem is that they shrank the font for everything. Browser zoom zooms the whole page (hello horizontal scrolling) and just isn't practical -- if I set a higher zoom for LJ it'll affect all my pages and things like profiles and help requests will be affected too. Ditto for Stylish; I don't know how to have it affect all and only individual entries.

Assuming that they're going to punt on my request to put it back (they usually punt on accessibility requests in my experience), could anyone reading this possibly, pretty please, write me a Greasemonkey script (or Stylish script, if you can figure out how) to put it back the way it was, or suggest some other browser customization that'll do it? Or an LJ style? (They claim they'll offer one in the future, but who knows how long?) I still have some old-style LJ pages in browser tabs so I'll harvest the source for one of them.

Big accessibility fail, LJ! Stop with the assumption that everybody in the world has 20/20 vision please.

Comments

Re: Signal boost: Fixing Livejournal. For real. And then getting away from it.

[magid.livejournal.com]

Both of those points are true, and yet, not exactly right, either. I was happy with my (ancient) S1 style, which I have indeed now changed to an S2 style to deal with their unilateral changes to commenting and such, but the new style isn't exactly what I'd choose. I was happy with S1, and it frustrates me to have to choose something else that I didn't want (not to mention the amount of time spent figuring out which S2 style was closest to what I'd prefer).

And I do cross-post from DW.... except in the middle of a DDOS attack, when cross-posting doesn't work.