Entry tags:
daf bit: K'ritot 24
The mishna teaches: if a person brings a suspensive guilt-offering (brought
in a case where there is doubt about whether he sinned) and then learns
that he did not sin, if the animal has not yet been slaughtered then Rabbi
Meir says it can go out to pasture (that it, is returns to its unconcescrated
state). The sages, however, say that it is put out to pasture until it
acquires a blemish (making it unfit for the altar) and then it is sold,
with the proceeds going to the temple. R. Eliezer says it is still offered,
if not for this sin then for another. The g'mara
tries to reconcile the positions of R. Meir and the rabbis, raising additional
considerations. One is: was the man so troubled that his conscience
compelled him to make a binding resolution? Another: did the doubt
arise from witnesses who might turn out to be false, so the person
himself was never unsure, only the community? These factors matter,
the g'mara says. (23b mishna, 24a g'mara)
I wonder if R. Eliezer had young children when he taught this: ok, you didn't sin that sin, but surely you've done something you need to atone for!
no subject
I totally grew up in the wrong religion. You'd never find Methodists debating anything vaguely more interesting than what people are bringing to the next potluck.
no subject
Hey, casseroles must be important, in some ritual fashion that eludes me. :-)