cellio: (talmud)
Monica ([personal profile] cellio) wrote2013-06-13 09:04 am
Entry tags:

daf bit: Eruvin 96

In addressing what can be carried on Shabbat, the talmud discusses t'fillin (phylacteries) that have been found. These are ritual objects and will be missed by their owner. This leads to a discussion of whether t'fillin are worn on Shabbat; Rabbi Akiva says yes, while others say no. How can R. Akiva say this when he elsewhere said that t'fillin are a sign, and we don't need a sign on a day that itself is a sign? This relies on a Tanna who said that t'fillin may be worn at night, and if night is a proper time for wearing t'fillin then certainly Shabbat is. The Akiva question is not here resolved, but the g'mara notes in passing that Michal the daughter of the Kushite (I don't know who this is) wore t'fillin and the sages did not attempt to prevent her. The g'mara then goes on to discuss other things, not taking up the question of women wearing t'fillin. (96a)

Modern practice: t'fillin are worn only during the day, not on Shabbat, and not by women. Liberal and egalitarian communities disagree on the last point, and apparently some S'fardim consider it optional for women.

(Today's daf is 97.)

[identity profile] magid.livejournal.com 2013-06-13 01:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd say more that "not usually by women," since there's at least some women known to have worn them in the past, and I know some women who have taken this on as well. Not that it's easy for them to do this in many traditional community prayers, of course.

[identity profile] hlinspjalda.livejournal.com 2013-06-13 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
This reminds me of the struggle between Women of the Wall and their detractors over access to the kotel. I hadn't been aware of the nuance posed by Sefardic opinions; that's an interesting wrinkle that's not been covered by any journalist I've read yet.

[identity profile] chaos-wrangler.livejournal.com 2013-06-14 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
A while ago (less than 20 years but more than a couple) there was a girl at the (Orthodox) high school I went to who wanted to wear tfilin. The school wanted to let her but didn't want it to turn into a political statement mess, so they said she could wear tfilin if she davened at the regular minyan at the synagogue that the school is affiliated with instead of at the school's student minyan - kind of "if you're doing it for adult reasons, you may do it with the adults; if it's just to make a statement, then we're not going to let that happen here".

[identity profile] chaos-wrangler.livejournal.com 2013-06-14 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
I'm guessing that she already wore tfilin at home (e.g. during the summer, Sundays, other non-school days) so this was a way to let her continue an observance that she had already tried on her own and decided to take on permanently. I'm also guessing that the school would have allowed her to return to the standard school minyan if she chose to.
fauxklore: (Default)

[personal profile] fauxklore 2013-06-16 01:44 pm (UTC)(link)
My understanding is that t'fillin are generally considered more acceptable for women than a tallit. The argument against women wearing t'fillin is that we are not obliged to perform mitzvot that require being done at specific times. (That is, of course, tied to traditional ideas about responsibilities for children and women are exempted from time-based mitzvot because they might not be able to perform them at the right times.) So there isn't an actual prohibition against them, just a lack of obligation.

A tallit, however, could be considered wearing the clothes of the opposite sex, which there is a prohibition against.